Hi,
I
submitted a patch (#1686) for this about two weeks ago. The change
to java.lang.String is actually fairly important for Jikes RVM (our implementation
of String.intern is buggy on classpath until this goes in). Should
I resubmit as two patches to make it easier for someone to apply the
Hi Dave,
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 00:02, David P Grove wrote:
I submitted a patch (#1686) for this about two weeks ago. The
change to java.lang.String is actually fairly important for Jikes RVM
I already looked at them and they look OK, but I wanted to test them out
with at least one
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 17:02, David P Grove wrote:
One way I could proceed would be to add VMString, VMFloat, and
VMDouble classes and move the bodies of the relevant methods to these new
classes. This seems to be consistent with the way other classes are
structured. If this
David P Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I'd like to make some minor changes to java.lang.String,
java.lang.Float, and java.lang.Double to make then work with Jikes RVM
slightly better. The desired effect of the changes are:
(1) move implementation of
4 matches
Mail list logo
