Hi Gary (and moved to classpath-patches),
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 15:15 +, Gary Benson wrote:
Aha! There is your clue. libgcj hasn't merged in the new nio charset
provider setup. And indeed creating a new CharsetProvider requires a
RuntimePermission(charsetProvider). Even for creating the
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your quick reply, and apologies for my egregiously slow
one...
Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 17:55 +, Gary Benson wrote:
Gary Benson wrote:
Robert Lougher wrote:
Do you have a testcase?
If you build and run the attached testcase you ought to
Hi Gary,
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 17:55 +, Gary Benson wrote:
Gary Benson wrote:
Robert Lougher wrote:
Do you have a testcase?
If you build and run the attached testcase you ought to see only one
checkPermission() between Calling checkRead() and Done. ... In
reality, JamVM chokes
Gary Benson wrote:
Robert Lougher wrote:
Do you have a testcase?
If you build and run the attached testcase you ought to see only one
checkPermission() between Calling checkRead() and Done. ... In
reality, JamVM chokes on it pretty hard. I _think_ what is
happening is that the
Robert Lougher wrote:
On 12/6/05, Gary Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...I was just looking at an some code in an
AccessController.doPrivileged() that was doing security checks.
Perhaps JamVM's AccessController.doPrivileged() is not in fact
doing anything.
What version of JamVM are
On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 16:14 +, Gary Benson wrote:
I'm having security manager problems, with JamVM at least. Various
initialisations happen the first time a permission is checked,
including java.security.Security's clinit method which reads the
provider files $vendor.security and
Anthony Green wrote:
On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 16:14 +, Gary Benson wrote:
I'm having security manager problems, with JamVM at least.
Various initialisations happen the first time a permission is
checked, including java.security.Security's clinit method which
reads the provider files
Anthony == Anthony Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anthony Perhaps. Implementing proper sandbox behaviour is easy to defer. I
Anthony think it will take the kind of work you are doing to drive VMs to take
Anthony care of details like this. Do we even do it properly in libgcj (being
Anthony
Anthony == Anthony Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anthony It's been a long time since I've read anything about this
Anthony kind of stuff, but my understanding is that you simply wrap
Anthony things like this up in a AccessController.doPrivileged(),
Anthony since the access control context of
Hi,
On 12/6/05, Gary Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony Green wrote:
It's been a long time since I've read anything about this kind of
stuff, but my understanding is that you simply wrap things like this
up in a AccessController.doPrivileged(), since the access control
context of
10 matches
Mail list logo