Re: Swing question

Hi, I was looking through the JAPI results for Swing and came across this oddity: class javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicInternalFrameTitlePane.TitlePaneLayout: public in jdk14, but protected in classpath Suns' javadoc says this: This inner class is marked public due to a compiler

Swing question

Tom ___ Classpath mailing list Classpath@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath

Swing question

Sorry, my fingers slipped and that last message went out early... I was looking through the JAPI results for Swing and came across this oddity: class javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicInternalFrameTitlePane.TitlePaneLayout: public in jdk14, but protected in classpath Suns' javadoc says this:

Re: Swing question

Tom For source compatibility we ought to mark these classes public and add Tom an @specnote to the javadoc. On second thought I think this is definitely what we should do, and I notice that it is in fact what we already do in some situations. So, I am going to check in a fix. Tom

Re: Swing question

On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 11:56:22AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: Sorry, my fingers slipped and that last message went out early... I was looking through the JAPI results for Swing and came across this oddity: class javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicInternalFrameTitlePane.TitlePaneLayout: public

Re: Swing question

Thomas == Thomas Zander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This inner class is marked public due to a compiler bug. This class should be treated as a protected inner class. Thomas I'd suggest protected for the same reason we don't implement Thomas the com.sun.* classes; they are not in the official

Re: Swing question

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 11:49:51 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: Tom Yes. I agree wholeheartedly. /Sven ___ Classpath mailing list Classpath@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath