Re: Win CE port

2006-01-24 Thread Philippe Laporte
Hi, Thanks for the answers. Yes, I mean rather Java VMs as seen as belonging to seperate categories according to their licensing requirements. Yet, the information you provide seems to be in contraditction somewhat with what they have at http://sablevm.org/wiki/License_FAQ Thanks,

Re: Win CE port

2006-01-24 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Philippe, On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 13:31 +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote: Thanks for the answers. Yes, I mean rather Java VMs as seen as belonging to seperate categories according to their licensing requirements. Yet, the information you provide seems to be in contraditction somewhat

Re: Win CE port

2006-01-24 Thread Dalibor Topic
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 01:31:33PM +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote: Hi, Thanks for the answers. Yes, I mean rather Java VMs as seen as belonging to seperate categories according to their licensing requirements. Yet, the information you provide seems to be in contraditction somewhat

Re: Win CE port

2006-01-21 Thread Dalibor Topic
Philippe Laporte wrote: Hi, It is our understanding that a GPL VM can't be freely redistributed in a commercial product. You can use and redistribute a GPLd VM, just like how you can use or redistribute GNU/Linux in products. You need to comply with the provisions of the GPL for the

Re: Win CE port

2006-01-21 Thread Per Bothner
Roman Kennke wrote: Hi there, Am Freitag, den 20.01.2006, 13:05 -0800 schrieb Per Bothner: Mark Wielaard wrote: Hi Phillipe, On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 15:03 +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote: It is our understanding that a GPL VM can't be freely redistributed in a commercial product.

Re: Win CE port

2006-01-20 Thread Philippe Laporte
Hi, You mean it's a simple gcc target? Thanks, Philippe Laporte Software Gatespace Telematics Första Långgatan 18 41328 Göteborg Sweden Phone: +46 702 04 35 11 Fax: +46 31 24 16 50 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Roman Kennke wrote: Hi Philippe, Am Donnerstag, den 19.01.2006, 18:56 +0100

Re: Win CE port

2006-01-20 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Phillipe, On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 15:03 +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote: It is our understanding that a GPL VM can't be freely redistributed in a commercial product. There should be no trouble at all freely redistributing such a thing in a commercial product. Just make sure you distribute

Re: Win CE port

2006-01-20 Thread Philippe Laporte
Hi, It is our understanding that a GPL VM can't be freely redistributed in a commercial product. We therefore have stopped looking after seeing a satisfactory LGPL VM. Other insights? Thanks a lot, Philippe Laporte Software Gatespace Telematics Första Långgatan 18 41328 Göteborg

Re: Win CE port

2006-01-20 Thread Per Bothner
Mark Wielaard wrote: Hi Phillipe, On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 15:03 +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote: It is our understanding that a GPL VM can't be freely redistributed in a commercial product. There should be no trouble at all freely redistributing such a thing in a commercial product. Just

Win CE port

2006-01-19 Thread Philippe Laporte
Hi, I believe that Classpath has been ported to Win CE, correct? What library did you use to achieve POSIX compatibility? What toolchain? Thanks, -- Philippe Laporte Software Gatespace Telematics Första Långgatan 18 41328 Göteborg Sweden Phone: +46 702 04 35 11 Fax: +46 31 24 16 50