Re: mauve comparison with tgolem

2005-12-01 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Christian, On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 21:20 +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote: On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 15:04 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: * Changed implementation of VMClassLoader.getPackage(s) : new method VMClassLoader.getBootPackages should be implemented by the vm, and sould return a

Re: mauve comparison with tgolem

2005-11-30 Thread Christian Thalinger
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 15:04 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: FAIL: gnu.testlet.java.lang.Package.getPackage: checking package for 'java.lang' (number 1) Needs runtime support. See NEWS file: * Changed implementation of VMClassLoader.getPackage(s) : new method VMClassLoader.getBootPackages

Re: mauve comparison with tgolem

2005-11-29 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Edwin, On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 14:54 +0100, Edwin Steiner wrote: On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 02:01:53AM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: If it is in addition to what there is now already just the plain FAIL lines would be ideal to have. No extras, just the facts! :) You can now get a text-only

Re: mauve comparison with tgolem

2005-11-28 Thread Edwin Steiner
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 02:01:53AM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: If it is in addition to what there is now already just the plain FAIL lines would be ideal to have. No extras, just the facts! :) You can now get a text-only list of common mauve fails at:

Re: mauve comparison with tgolem

2005-11-25 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Cacao Team, On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 12:33 +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote: http://www.cacaojvm.org/tgolem The mauve report is the comparison table. The common column shows all PASSes and FAILs which are identical on all JVMs/architectures. Each machine is listed with PASS, FAIL and MISS.

Re: mauve comparison with tgolem

2005-11-25 Thread Edwin Steiner
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 07:35:46PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: [snip] In principle the mauve framework can support xfail files, although I don't believe anybody used that for a long time. When all common failures are inspected/identified correctly we could make a good xfails file so it is

Re: mauve comparison with tgolem

2005-11-25 Thread Tom Tromey
Edwin == Edwin Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Edwin Yes. All our machines are headless, so there is no X display. We are Edwin pondering to use a virtual X server, but we don't have a real Edwin solution right now. Any ideas would be appreciated. Take a look at the batch_run script in Mauve.

Re: mauve comparison with tgolem

2005-11-25 Thread Edwin Steiner
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:42:25PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: Edwin == Edwin Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Edwin Yes. All our machines are headless, so there is no X display. We are Edwin pondering to use a virtual X server, but we don't have a real Edwin solution right now. Any ideas

Re: mauve comparison with tgolem

2005-11-25 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Edwin, On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 23:42 +0100, Edwin Steiner wrote: Would it be possible to split out the mauve results pages? Or at least have a page with just a list of all common FAILS? Absolutely possible. Are there any specific details I should include in such a page? If it is in

mauve comparison with tgolem

2005-11-22 Thread Christian Thalinger
Hi! One of our CACAO developers, edwin, is currently developing a test framework called tgolem. It was initially intended for testing CACAO against different stuff, like mauve or tomcat. It generates output for the different architectures we run the tests on and a comparison table for all