Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

[Sorry for the duplicate message, trouble with my primary email account] Hi, On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 18:52 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: Thanks. This seems to point out two things: 1) There is a huge allocation (2MB+): GC: Alloc attempt for 2209016 bytes failed. at this point in the

Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

Hi, On 12/5/05, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Frederick, On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 21:26 -0500, Frederick C Druseikis wrote: I'm using gjdoc-0.7.6 to test a new port of JamVM-1.4.1 + classpath-0.19 on OpenBSD. I'm trying to get gjdoc to do all the classpath documentation. gjdoc

Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

Hi Fred, On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 12:32 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you also run JamVM with -verbose:gc and send me the output? Attached. Thanks. This seems to point out two things: 1) There is a huge allocation (2MB+): GC: Alloc attempt for 2209016 bytes failed. at this point

Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

Hi Rob, Could you also run JamVM with -verbose:gc and send me the output? Attached. I ran this from the Makefile in .../classpath-0.19/doc/api/Makefile defining the symbol GJDOC in the Makefile as GJDOC= gjdoc -J-Xms200m -J-Xmx900m -verbose:gc then do gmake html I also had to fiddle with

Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

Hi, On 12/5/05, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Fred, On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 12:32 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you also run JamVM with -verbose:gc and send me the output? Attached. Thanks. This seems to point out two things: 1) There is a huge allocation (2MB+):

Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

On 12/5/05, Robert Lougher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On 12/5/05, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Fred, On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 12:32 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you also run JamVM with -verbose:gc and send me the output? Attached. Thanks. This seems to

Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

Hi Robert, On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 18:10 +, Robert Lougher wrote: On second thoughts, it may have been rejected by gmail if the attachment was too big (how big was it?). Could you try compressing it (if it wasn't)? It is in the gmane archives here:

Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

Hi, On 12/5/05, Robert Lougher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On 12/5/05, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) JamVM has fragmented its heap so much that it cannot allocate such a block of data even though there is enough space in total: GC: Largest block is 2087448 total free is

memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6

Greetings, I'm using gjdoc-0.7.6 to test a new port of JamVM-1.4.1 + classpath-0.19 on OpenBSD. I'm trying to get gjdoc to do all the classpath documentation. gjdoc makes a lot of progress (it's outputting stuff), but blows off by hitting an upper memory limit. My question is this: Should I