Re: please test: XMLEncoder patch - version 2

2006-01-10 Thread Chris Burdess
Robert Schuster wrote: Btw: Currently the encoder relies on the StAX implementation. If someone decides to rip that out one has to provide an alternative gnu.java.beans.encoder.Writer implementation. It only relies on the StAX public interface, which is fine as that is not going anywhere.

Re: please test: XMLEncoder patch - version 2

2006-01-09 Thread Roman Kennke
Hi Robert, Is it really necessary to directly reference all those classes in java.beans.Encoder.setupDefaultPersistenceDelegates()? Can you explain what this method does and why the encoder won't work without these persistent delegates? I am asking, because we had discussions about breaking down

Re: please test: XMLEncoder patch - version 2

2005-12-27 Thread Tom Tromey
Robert == Robert Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Robert I have worked on the XMLEncoder once more. Unless you think there are potentially big design flaws, requiring a lot of work to fix, I would say that it would be better to simply check in what you have. This won't break anything (any