Classpath seems to focus on japhar as main release/testing platform. I
understand that japhar needs core library, but I don't think that it is
best place to test it. Maybe kaffe could be used instead ? It is a lot
more stable, faster, has free java library that can be used to fill gaps
(in other
"John Keiser" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like the idea of borrowing Kaffe's AWT (you didn't say it
specifically, but it makes the most sense), simply because no one
has worked on it here
There are three GNU Classpath people actively working on an AWT
implementation in GTK+ -- Jim Blair,
Paul,
For example, if I were to add a new GC to the GPL'd Kaffe, would I
have to sign the copyright over to TVT in order to have my changes
distributed with the official free version of Kaffe? And if I did
assign my copyright to Transvirtual, could they then turn around and
relicense
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Fisher
"John Keiser" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
un-splintering the community's resources.
I really don't see the community's resources as being splintered.
Transvirtual is working on their libs, and free
Transvirtual is motivated by the
fact that they can relicense their code base for proprietary use and
modification -- they of course can't do that if they start accepting
outside code.
It is true that Transvirtual requires outside contributors to give up
their copyright (and give it to
I believe that once we port to Kaffe we will see cooperation on the class
libraries.
I am curious, though, what specifically have we done better? The only thing
I can think of is that our stuff has more doc comments ... and we have 1.2
java.util.
I do suggest that whoever works on AWT look at
Artur Biesiadowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe kaffe could be used instead ? It is a lot more stable, faster,
has free java library that can be used to fill gaps (in other case
we need to fill gaps with JDK classlib).
One of the great benefits of using Japhar is that we're
Godmar Back [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As mentioned in my other mail, contributors to classpath are also
not allowed to retain their copyright if they want their
contributions to go into the classpath source.
The FSF's assignment policy's main purpose is to ensure that all
versions of a GNU
Ah, OK, makes sense. Thanks for the correction of my correction :)
--John Keiser
-Original Message-
From: Godmar Back [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 1998 2:04 PM
To: John Keiser
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Correction of
Brian Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Guile is back into developmental state, so use the most recent stable
version which I _think_ is 1.91 (but I'm just pulling that out of
my...) if you're wanting to do the testsuite stuff.
You don't mean 1.91. You mean 1.2.91. :)
The latest stable
Tim wrote:
Don't know if anyone else is looking into this but we'd like to put
together a free Java BOF at the coming JavaOne and obviously it'd make
sense to get all the free Java people together for this.
Any interest?
Yes, absolutely.
AG
--
Anthony Green
If any one can help me please unsubscribe me now. Help.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 1998 12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Tim Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't know if anyone else is looking into this but we'd like to put
together a free Java BOF at the coming JavaOne and obviously it'd make
sense to get all the free Java people together for this. We've tried to
do this informally the last two years
Sounds reasonable. One format is 5-10 presentation from each group,
followed by 5-10 minutes questions to a specific group, followed
by open floor.
However, 60 minutes in length may not be enough for all the groups.
Two back-to-back sessions would be better, if we could get it.
Alternatively,
I'm definitely interested. My suggestion would be to make sure that this
BOF is as near the beginning of the conference as possible. This will help
us to have the maximum amount of time available during the conference with
which to collaborate with each other, since we will have already met
15 matches
Mail list logo
