FW: [Patch #11] Fix java.lang.Boolean to be immutable

2001-07-18 Thread Eric Blake
Which commits list is official? Attached is the message savannah sent me after updating a patch, and it sent to classpath-commits. But looking at mail.gnu.org, the CVS changes are tracked on commit-classpath. It doesn't make much sense to have two commits list. By the way, I think that the

Re: FW: [Patch #11] Fix java.lang.Boolean to be immutable

2001-07-18 Thread Brian Jones
Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Which commits list is official? Attached is the message savannah sent me after updating a patch, and it sent to classpath-commits. But looking at mail.gnu.org, the CVS changes are tracked on commit-classpath. It doesn't make much sense to have two

mini vote

2001-07-18 Thread Brian Jones
I'm interested in finding out if the majority of developers would like to see the AWT placed under the same license (GPL + exception) that other Classpath libraries are licensed with. If you think the AWT library should use the same license, reply with some form of Yes and otherwise respond with

Re: mini vote

2001-07-18 Thread Stuart Ballard
Brian Jones wrote: I'm interested in finding out if the majority of developers would like to see the AWT placed under the same license (GPL + exception) that other Classpath libraries are licensed with. If you think the AWT library should use the same license, reply with some form of Yes

Re: another bug

2001-07-18 Thread R.S. Veldema
Hi, more bugs, changed the LOADING, COMPLETE, etc from private to protected inside java.awt.MediaEntry since they we're accessed inside java.awt.ImageMediaEntry R. ___ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: small bug

2001-07-18 Thread Eric Blake
Call me a miminalist, but this version does the same as your proposal with less source and less bytecode: public Object[] getSelectedObjects() { return state ? new Object[] { getLabel() } : null; } Of course, this is taking your example out of context (I haven't looked at AWT, and your

Re: mini vote

2001-07-18 Thread John Keiser
On 18 Jul 2001 09:49:47 -0400, Brian Jones wrote: I'm interested in finding out if the majority of developers would like to see the AWT placed under the same license (GPL + exception) that other Classpath libraries are licensed with. If you think the AWT library should use the same license,

Re: small bug

2001-07-18 Thread arenn
R.S. Veldema ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, im giving classpath's awt a go with my compiler, so checked a version out. One bug discovered thusfar: Fixed. Thanks for the report. -- Aaron M. Renn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/

[patch] for ImageMediaEntry

2001-07-18 Thread Takashi Okamoto
Hello. This is a patch to compile java.awt.ImageMediaEntry regards. Takashi Okamoto classpath.patch