hi Mark,
--- Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
benchmarks were mentioned earlier on shudo.net. If someone has more
suggestions please let me know.
One word: Ashes ( http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/ashes/ ). Big, free java
benchmarking suite, that hardly gets used. To run it with kaffe, check
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Koch wrote:
| I currently search some performance comparisons for a german company
| which thinks about switching to gcj.
|
|
| Michael
I'm new to the list, so excuse me if this is naive, but I don't quite
understand the idea of gcj. It seems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 8. Juli 2003 08:43 schrieben Sie:
Michael Koch wrote:
| I currently search some performance comparisons for a german
| company which thinks about switching to gcj.
|
|
| Michael
I'm new to the list, so excuse me if this is naive,
--- Christopher Granade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Koch wrote:
| I currently search some performance comparisons for a german company
| which thinks about switching to gcj.
|
|
| Michael
I'm new to the list, so excuse me if this is
Mark Wielaard wrote:
[benchmark results]
Something to note: At least for IKVM (and I suspect for others as well),
the floating point benchmarks are probably inflated since I don't think
it implements FP correctly (i.e. it uses x86 FP and not the JVM model).
Regards,
Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| Christopher: Please use a valid From: address next time.
Eh? Was [EMAIL PROTECTED] not given as the From address? Or do
you mean that I accidently send to you instead of the list, due to
the Reply-To header being missing. I see that mailman is
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 07:00, Michael Koch wrote:
Let me know if you have other benchmark/speed test stories.
It would be nice if you could put this onto a webpage for reference.
I currently search some performance comparisons for a german company
which thinks about switching to gcj.
The resulting JikesRVM binary and image
keep seg faulting however on my machine
The most likely explanation for this is that your
glibc is not using the GS register for pthread local state. You can kludge
around this by building Jikes RVM with RVM_FOR_SINGLE_VIRTUAL_PROCESSOR=1.
However, the
Hi,
On Sunday 29 June 2003 19:38, Mark Wielaard wrote:
I will be going to The Libre Software Meeting
(http://www.libresoftwaremeeting.org/) on Friday July 11th
and be on LinuxTag on Saterday and Sunday.
I am meeting Dalibor Topic (of kaffe fame) who will also be on both
events.
I can be on
Andy Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 8 Jul 2003 13:09:09 +0200:
I can be on LinuxTag on Saterday or Sunday, too. I would be very
interested in meeting with you guys. Should we fix a certain meeting
point?
Saturday, 16:00, booth E40
I'm scheduled to stand at the booth of FSF Europe,
Something to note: At least for IKVM (and I suspect for others as well),
the floating point benchmarks are probably inflated since I don't think
it implements FP correctly (i.e. it uses x86 FP and not the JVM model).
The Java 2 JVM model allows double-precision arithmetic in x86 FP
semantics
Hi Kazayuki,
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something to note: At least for IKVM (and I suspect for others as well),
the floating point benchmarks are probably inflated since I don't think
it implements FP correctly (i.e. it uses x86 FP and not the JVM model).
The Java 2 JVM model allows
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 16:28, Andy Walter wrote:
In case you would prefer meeting earlier or later that day, this would be fine
for me, as well. Mark and Dalibor, do you have any time constraints for
saturday?
Saturday 16:00 at the FSF Europe boot will be fine. But anywhere/anytime
on
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 12:38, David P Grove wrote:
The most likely explanation for this is that your glibc is not using
the GS register for pthread local state. You can kludge around this by
building Jikes RVM with RVM_FOR_SINGLE_VIRTUAL_PROCESSOR=1.
Thanks. That was probably it since I
--- Andy Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sascha,
In case you would prefer meeting earlier or later that day, this would be
fine
for me, as well. Mark and Dalibor, do you have any time constraints for
saturday? Is there anybody else of the Classpath project who plans to come to
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Dalibor Topic wrote:
bytecode is portable, but native objects are fast. So ideally, you'd use
bytecode for distribution, and use native compilation for local deployment.
Compiling from source is really the ideal situation, but yes,
bytecode-object works.
Also gcj-compiled
16 matches
Mail list logo
