awt - gtkpeers - threading

2003-11-16 Thread Joseph Wenninger
Hi First a general question, are the gtk peers in the 0.06 tarball or in cvs supposed to work ? If yes: 1) Why is there a field native_state in the GtkMainThread accessed from native functions, but nowhere defined in the class ? 2) Any ideas, opinions, suggestions how to use the gtk peer in a

Re: awt - gtkpeers - threading

2003-11-16 Thread Tom Tromey
Joseph == Joseph Wenninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Joseph First a general question, are the gtk peers in the 0.06 tarball or in Joseph cvs supposed to work ? No, not completely. There are still plenty of bugs. AWT is in active development. Joseph 1) Why is there a field native_state in the

Re: awt - gtkpeers - threading

2003-11-16 Thread Joseph Wenninger
Hi Am Son, den 16.11.2003 schrieb Tom Tromey um 18:35: Joseph 1) Why is there a field native_state in the GtkMainThread Joseph accessed from native functions, but nowhere defined in the Joseph class ? Where do you see this? I don't see a field named native_state anywhere. There is

Re: awt - gtkpeers - threading

2003-11-16 Thread David P Grove
Jikes RVM uses a level of m-to-n threading and thus relies on the portable locking implementation that Tom mentioned. In classpath 0.06 this was not the default and the function vector hadn't been updated to GTK 2.0 (so it didn't work at all). I just tried with the cvs head of classpath, and it

[RFC] Upcoming Apache Software Foundation License changes

2003-11-16 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi all, excuse me for cross-posting the following e-mail to so many diverse projects. As I'm subscribed to all those projects mailing lists, I was surprised to notice a lack of discussion on the effect of the upcoming Apache Software Foundation (ASF) license changes [1] on them. Most of you