On 10:54 Sun 12 Dec , Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 12:45 +, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
I disagree. Just because the version in gcj is different doesn't mean
it's correct. As far as I'm aware, Pekka already has a testcase for
this so it would be good to have it in
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 12:45 +, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
I disagree. Just because the version in gcj is different doesn't mean
it's correct. As far as I'm aware, Pekka already has a testcase for
this so it would be good to have it in Mauve.
Sorry for the delay, here's a test case for
On 12/08/2010 05:17 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 11:13 Wed 08 Dec , Andrew Haley wrote:
On 12/08/2010 10:58 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
I hereby offer to review some patches. Please send pointers to the
list.
On 12/08/2010 05:15 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
In Ivan's case, I've reviewed a number of the patches and I've had to
do work on most of them to get them in a state where they can be
committed. This is why I've been hesitant on giving commit access if
the result is that it will break
On 12/08/2010 08:02 PM, Ivan Maidanski wrote:
I remember you (or someone else) had pointed me about of
inconvenience of reading my patches in the form they were attached
and I had promised to use .diff.txt file extension but forgot
about it after a long delay. (there is such problem in, say,
On 12/08/2010 08:02 PM, Ivan Maidanski wrote:
I remember you (or someone else) had pointed me about of
inconvenience of reading my patches in the form they were attached
and I had promised to use .diff.txt file extension but forgot
about it after a long delay. (there is such problem in, say,
On 11:03 Thu 09 Dec , Andrew Haley wrote:
On 12/08/2010 08:02 PM, Ivan Maidanski wrote:
I remember you (or someone else) had pointed me about of
inconvenience of reading my patches in the form they were attached
and I had promised to use .diff.txt file extension but forgot
about it
On 09:42 Thu 09 Dec , Andrew Haley wrote:
On 12/08/2010 05:17 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 11:13 Wed 08 Dec , Andrew Haley wrote:
On 12/08/2010 10:58 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
I hereby offer to review some
On 12/09/2010 12:44 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 11:03 Thu 09 Dec , Andrew Haley wrote:
On 12/08/2010 08:02 PM, Ivan Maidanski wrote:
I remember you (or someone else) had pointed me about of
inconvenience of reading my patches in the form they were attached
and I had promised to
On 12/09/2010 12:45 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 09:42 Thu 09 Dec , Andrew Haley wrote:
On 12/08/2010 05:17 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 11:13 Wed 08 Dec , Andrew Haley wrote:
On 12/08/2010 10:58 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Haley
Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 23:06 Tue 07 Dec, Mark Wielaard wrote:
As soon as I am back I would like us to at least start moving to
mercurial on savannah if people don't mind.
Yes, I do mind.
We already discussed this some time back:
Hi all, long time, no commit.
It is unclear from my vantage point what the purpose of Classpath should be.
Most of the VMs I'm familiar with who were essentially customers in the past
are moving to support openjdk's class library it seems Thank goodness for
JamVM and all the rest over the
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 23:53 +, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
I'll apologise in advance if some of what I've written below sounds harsh,
but I'm not that happy with the state of Free Java generally right now.
And I apologize for not stating the obvious. You are the only active
maintainer
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
Anyway, I don't mind that as long as someone else does it. (Clearly,
the issue of developers without commit access is a red herring, as
every developer should have commit access.)
But it's not a red herring! I don't expect
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
I hereby offer to review some patches. Please send pointers to the
list.
http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-November/006511.html
On 12/08/2010 10:56 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
Anyway, I don't mind that as long as someone else does it. (Clearly,
the issue of developers without commit access is a red herring, as
every developer should have commit access.)
On 12/08/2010 10:58 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
I hereby offer to review some patches. Please send pointers to the
list.
http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-November/006511.html
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
But I'm afraid people are looking at the things they think might make
a difference, but won't make a difference. I read the list, and
haven't seen a huge number of unreviewed patches, but I admit I
haven't been paying close
On 12/08/2010 10:58 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
I hereby offer to review some patches. Please send pointers to the
list.
http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-November/006511.html
This needs a
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/08/2010 10:56 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
Anyway, I don't mind that as long as someone else does it. (Clearly,
the issue of developers without
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
There's also 10-15 patches from Ivan sitting in the archives
Hmm, I had seen some discussion around those and thought they were being
addressed. Bring them on!
I'm not sure if this is all of it but it's a start anyway:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-November/006512.html
What compatibility problem does this fix?
That the result is not what we get with OpenJDK. JamVM, for example,
(and I guess CACAO) has fixed
On 12/08/2010 11:32 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
There's also 10-15 patches from Ivan sitting in the archives
Hmm, I had seen some discussion around those and thought they were being
addressed. Bring them on!
I'm not sure if
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm not sure if this is all of it but it's a start anyway:
http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006411.html
Ah, yes, these were the patches that were sent hex encoded with a
MIME type of
Andrew Haley wrote:
On 12/08/2010 11:23 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
In any case, even if everyone did have commit access, CVS is still
painful for *local* development.
Not for me. I mean, it's not great, but it's hardly a big factor in
the time it takes to develop code.
I think different
On 12/08/2010 11:37 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-November/006512.html
What compatibility problem does this fix?
That the result is not what we get with OpenJDK.
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
That the result is not what we get with OpenJDK. JamVM, for example,
(and I guess CACAO) has fixed this in their tree as has GCJ. The test
case I used for this is ClassTest.testGetSimpleName() here:
On 12/08/2010 11:47 AM, Gary Benson wrote:
Andrew Haley wrote:
On 12/08/2010 11:23 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
In any case, even if everyone did have commit access, CVS is still
painful for *local* development.
Not for me. I mean, it's not great, but it's hardly a big factor in
the time it
On 12/08/2010 11:49 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
That the result is not what we get with OpenJDK. JamVM, for example,
(and I guess CACAO) has fixed this in their tree as has GCJ. The test
case I used for this is
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
No need to live with it, I'll fix it up and resend.
This is truly weird. The gcj patch says:
2008-05-22 Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com
PR libgcj/35020
* java/lang/Class.java (getSimpleName): Import from GNU
On 12/08/2010 12:09 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
No need to live with it, I'll fix it up and resend.
This is truly weird. The gcj patch says:
2008-05-22 Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com
PR libgcj/35020
*
Il giorno mer, 08/12/2010 alle 09.26 +, Gary Benson ha scritto:
Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 23:06 Tue 07 Dec, Mark Wielaard wrote:
As soon as I am back I would like us to at least start moving to
mercurial on savannah if people don't mind.
Yes, I do mind.
We already
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/08/2010 11:44 AM, Brian Jones wrote:
I've only recently gone from svn to git and honestly git is freaking
awesome sauce.
I'm pretty sure what you are missing is how much nicer having local
branches can be for local
Il giorno mer, 08/12/2010 alle 13.45 +0200, Pekka Enberg ha scritto:
I completely agree. I have Ivan's patches locally and I'm planning to
go through them and resend them to the list unless he beats me to it.
Pekka
If we were using mecurial we could use review board
On 12/08/2010 12:57 PM, Mario Torre wrote:
Il giorno mer, 08/12/2010 alle 13.45 +0200, Pekka Enberg ha scritto:
I completely agree. I have Ivan's patches locally and I'm planning to
go through them and resend them to the list unless he beats me to it.
Pekka
If we
On 12/08/2010 01:23 PM, Mario Torre wrote:
Il giorno mer, 08/12/2010 alle 13.03 +, Andrew Haley ha scritto:
On 12/08/2010 12:57 PM, Mario Torre wrote:
If we were using mecurial we could use review board or webrew.
We could, but these just introduce extra barriers: it's very easy
to just
On 09:20 Wed 08 Dec , Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes
There are several inaccuracies in the points themselves. I'm not too
surprised, given that Pekka is still new to the project, but I am surprised
that you'd agree wholeheartedly with such
On 11:05 Wed 08 Dec , Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 23:53 +, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
I'll apologise in advance if some of what I've written below sounds harsh,
but I'm not that happy with the state of Free Java generally right now.
And I apologize for not
On 10:32 Wed 08 Dec , Andrew Haley wrote:
On 12/08/2010 10:05 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
As is, if you're going to put some time in, I'd rather it was spent
reviewing patches than messing about with the VCS.
Point taken. In my defense, I like tinkering with services around the
code
On 11:13 Wed 08 Dec , Andrew Haley wrote:
On 12/08/2010 10:58 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
I hereby offer to review some patches. Please send pointers to the
list.
On 08:16 Wed 08 Dec , Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes
gnu_and...@member.fsf.org wrote:
As soon as I am back I would like us to at least start moving to
mercurial on savannah if people don't mind.
Yes, I do mind.
We already discussed this
Hi Andrew and Pekka,
Thank you Pekka but there are also some more ones (in June 2010):
- http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12989 (follow the
link in body to get classpath-ivmai-05.diff);
- http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12988
2010/12/8 Ivan Maidanski iv...@mail.ru:
Hi Andrew and Pekka,
Thank you Pekka but there are also some more ones (in June 2010):
- http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12989 (follow
the link in body to get classpath-ivmai-05.diff);
-
Hi all,
For those who didn't see Pekka's blog on planet.classpath.org you can
find it here:
http://penberg.posterous.com/whats-the-future-of-gnu-classpath
He makes some very good points. I agree with all of them.
Now the cool thing would be if I said lets do them all right now!.
But instead I am
Il giorno mar, 07/12/2010 alle 23.06 +0100, Mark Wielaard ha scritto:
Hi all,
For those who didn't see Pekka's blog on planet.classpath.org you can
find it here:
http://penberg.posterous.com/whats-the-future-of-gnu-classpath
He makes some very good points. I agree with all of them.
Now
On 23:06 Tue 07 Dec , Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Mark,
I'll apologise in advance if some of what I've written below sounds harsh,
but I'm not that happy with the state of Free Java generally right now.
For those who didn't see Pekka's blog on planet.classpath.org you can
find it
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes
gnu_and...@member.fsf.org wrote:
As soon as I am back I would like us to at least start moving to
mercurial on savannah if people don't mind.
Yes, I do mind.
We already discussed this some time back:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes
gnu_and...@member.fsf.org wrote:
For those who didn't see Pekka's blog on planet.classpath.org you can
find it here:
http://penberg.posterous.com/whats-the-future-of-gnu-classpath
He makes some very good points. I agree with all of them.
48 matches
Mail list logo
