On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 11:39 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
I'm submitting this for comment before checking it in.
This implements URLConnection.guessContentTypeFromStream. It adds a
new VMURLConnection class to which the method defers. The reference
implementation of this VM class uses
I'm committing the attached patch which fixes the -Werror
build of the new VMURLConnection code. Unused parameters are
now marked as such. This also entails changing the check_jni_methods
script slightly, so that one declaration in the header file matches
up with an arbitrary number in the
Sven de Marothy wrote:
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 15:23 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
Andreas == Andreas Tobler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas classpath/native/jni/qt-peer/eventmethods.h:111: warning: deprecated
Andreas conversion from string constant to 'char*''
Andreas There are quite a lot of
Andrew == Andrew John Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andrew I'm committing the attached patch which fixes the -Werror
Andrew build of the new VMURLConnection code. Unused parameters are
Andrew now marked as such.
Thanks. And, sorry for not noticing this.
Andrew This also entails changing
Martin wrote:
I have discovered two bugs in EventRequestCommandSet and
ThreadGroupReferenceCommandSet.
In the attachment there is a patch to fix them.
I don't know if my say is needed for approval or whatnot, but FWIW these
patches are correct. If you don't have CVS access, let me know and
Hi all,
the attached patch makes Graphics2D javadoc use the full class name to
access java.awt.print.PrinterJob.
cheers,
dalibor topic
2006-05-27 Dalibor Topic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* java/awt/Graphics2D.java: Use full class name for
PrinterJob in javadoc.
Index:
Michael Koch wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:50:10PM -0400, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
Hi,
applications that use the AWT Native Interface refer to libjawt.so.
For binary compatibility with other AWT Native Interface implementations
our .so must be named the same.
Note to packagers:
On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 14:20 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
...
How about just using __attribute__((unused)) like we do elsewhere?
This is fine to use even if the argument really is used; it really
means might be unused.
Tom
I just assumed that it had the most obvious semantics i.e. that the
