This removes any usage of the Buffers helper class in
ComponentSampleModel. The problem with that has been that it casts the
DataBuffer to some specific subtype, which wouldn't work for other
independent implementations of DataBuffer (e.g. a DataBuffer that maps
to raw shared memory). Also, the
This removes one usage of the Buffers class from
SinglePixelPackedSampleModel (the Buffers class covers more than is
supported by the SPPSM).
2007-03-09 Roman Kennke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* java/awt/image/SinglePixelPackageSampleModel.java
(createDataBuffer): Avoid use of Buffers
Tom Tromey wrote:
Marco == Marco Trudel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marco The attached CharsetEncoderTest.java fails on Windows with an
Marco IllegalStateException. It works on Linux. I don't know why, but I
Marco assume because it doesn't need a CharsetEncoder.
Yeah, I think the Linux code may
Hi,
The Classpath Hacker's Guide doesn't mention anything about annotations.
Doing a quick grep of the sources, I see that, e.g., the @Override
annotation is being handled in several different ways:
@Override
public void foo();
@Override public void foo();
public @Override void foo();
Do
Il giorno ven, 09/03/2007 alle 10.35 -0800, Keith Seitz ha scritto:
@Override
public void foo();
I suggest this one. It seems more clear to me.
Ciao,
Mario
--
Lima Software - http://www.limasoftware.net/
GNU Classpath Developer - http://www.classpath.org/
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Mario Torre writes:
Il giorno ven, 09/03/2007 alle 10.35 -0800, Keith Seitz ha scritto:
@Override
public void foo();
I suggest this one. It seems more clear to me.
+1
Andrew.
Marco == Marco Trudel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah, I think the Linux code may take a different path on this
particular test case. But, I do see a similar bug here on Linux with
Mauve.
Marco Can you send me that test? I can't reproduce it on Linux...
It is the String.getBytes13 test from
Mario == Mario Torre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
@Override
public void foo();
Mario I suggest this one. It seems more clear to me.
Me too. Three votes... maybe the motion passes? :)
FWIW you won't see too many annotations in the source right now,
especially not @Override. I think it would
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:25:37PM +0100, Mario Torre wrote:
Il giorno ven, 09/03/2007 alle 10.35 -0800, Keith Seitz ha scritto:
@Override
public void foo();
I suggest this one. It seems more clear to me.
+1
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' : | Free
Tom Tromey wrote:
Mario == Mario Torre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
@Override
public void foo();
Me too. Three votes... maybe the motion passes? :)
So that's several votes for this style already. One last question: what
about comments/javadoc?
1) Before
@Override
/**
* foo
*/
2)
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:05:42PM -0800, Keith Seitz wrote:
Tom Tromey wrote:
Mario == Mario Torre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
@Override
public void foo();
Me too. Three votes... maybe the motion passes? :)
So that's several votes for this style already. One last question: what
Il giorno ven, 09/03/2007 alle 12.05 -0800, Keith Seitz ha scritto:
2) After
/**
* foo
*/
@Override
I presume most people would prefer #1?
Keith
I speak for myself, but I think most of us agree here, doing #1 would
make things to lost easily, for example in case of longs
@Override
public void foo();
Me too. Three votes... maybe the motion passes? :)
So that's several votes for this style already.
+1, FWIW
2) After
/**
* foo
*/
@Override
+1 for annotations after javadoc, it feels clearer that way.
Francis
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 15:17 -0500, Francis Kung wrote:
@Override
public void foo();
Me too. Three votes... maybe the motion passes? :)
So that's several votes for this style already.
+1, FWIW
2) After
/**
* foo
*/
@Override
+1 for annotations after javadoc, it
Mario Torre wrote:
Il giorno ven, 09/03/2007 alle 12.05 -0800, Keith Seitz ha scritto:
2) After
/**
* foo
*/
@Override
I presume most people would prefer #1?
Keith
I speak for myself, but I think most of us agree here, doing #1 would
make things to lost easily, for example in case of
[my apologies for the delay in getting back to you]
Kyle Galloway wrote:
Keith Seitz wrote:
I see that this method can throw InvalidObjectException if the object
ID is not known by the ID manager. How is JdwpInternalErrorException
thrown?
This gets thrown by JdwpString.readString().
Keith Seitz wrote:
[my apologies for the delay in getting back to you]
Kyle Galloway wrote:
Keith Seitz wrote:
I see that this method can throw InvalidObjectException if the
object ID is not known by the ID manager. How is
JdwpInternalErrorException thrown?
This gets thrown by
Hi all,
I'm going to commit this one soon.
It is a change which is already in gcc. Fails w/o patch under darwin-ppc.
Andreas
2007-03-09 Andreas Tobler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Port change from gcc:
2007-03-06 Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
18 matches
Mail list logo
