On 26 October 2010 21:00, Pekka Enberg penb...@kernel.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm now carrying this and one other patch in my github branch:
http://github.com/penberg/classpath/tree/maint/penberg
It's frustrating that CVS trunk doesn't build out of the box and that
reviewed patches are
On 11/4/10 3:18 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Sorry for the delay on this, but I'm unsure about the copyright
situation. From reading
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44411, it seems to be the
work of Roland Brand, it's his first patch and both myself and Mark
agree it's trivial
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 15:27 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On 11/4/10 3:18 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Sorry for the delay on this, but I'm unsure about the copyright
situation. From reading
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44411, it seems to be the
work of Roland Brand, it's
On 4 November 2010 13:27, Pekka Enberg penb...@kernel.org wrote:
On 11/4/10 3:18 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Sorry for the delay on this, but I'm unsure about the copyright
situation. From reading
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44411, it seems to be the
work of Roland
On 5 November 2010 00:16, Dr Andrew John Hughes
gnu_and...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On 4 November 2010 13:27, Pekka Enberg penb...@kernel.org wrote:
On 11/4/10 3:18 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Sorry for the delay on this, but I'm unsure about the copyright
situation. From reading
Hi, Pekka!
I remember your patch sent a month ago. As I already learned, the Gnu guys are
very serious about copyrights (as well as they are busy with other projects,
and not to mention there is little interest to this project from the community
since OpenJDK emerged). You mentioned that the
On 26.10.2010 23.00, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm now carrying this and one other patch in my github branch:
http://github.com/penberg/classpath/tree/maint/penberg
It's frustrating that CVS trunk doesn't build out of the box and that
reviewed patches are not getting merged. :(
From: Roland Brand roland.br...@ergon.ch
As explained by AdamB:
On Linux, Classpath appears to implement the System.nanoTime() function using
the gettimeofday function (see java_lang_VMSystem.c). Since gettimeofday
returns a wall-clock time this makes it unreliable for measuring elapsed
On 23 September 2010 18:43, Pekka Enberg penb...@kernel.org wrote:
From: Roland Brand roland.br...@ergon.ch
As explained by AdamB:
On Linux, Classpath appears to implement the System.nanoTime() function using
the gettimeofday function (see java_lang_VMSystem.c). Since gettimeofday
