Re: [cp-patches] Fix libjava bootstrap failure around IUCLC

2012-03-26 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 10:01 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: On 03/25/2012 05:08 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: 2012-03-25 Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com PR libgcj/52694 * java/io/natVMConsole.cc (IUCLC): Define, if undefined. Sure. WTF is IUCLC anyway? :-) (map) Input

Re: [cp-patches] Fix libjava bootstrap failure around IUCLC

2012-03-26 Thread Pekka Enberg
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Mark Wielaard m...@klomp.org wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 10:01 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: On 03/25/2012 05:08 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: 2012-03-25  Gerald Pfeifer  ger...@pfeifer.com         PR libgcj/52694         * java/io/natVMConsole.cc (IUCLC):

Re: [cp-patches] Fix libjava bootstrap failure around IUCLC

2012-03-26 Thread Andrew Haley
On 03/26/2012 11:47 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Mark Wielaard m...@klomp.org wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 10:01 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: On 03/25/2012 05:08 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: 2012-03-25 Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com PR libgcj/52694

Re: [cp-patches] Fix libjava bootstrap failure around IUCLC

2012-03-26 Thread Pekka Enberg
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote: Btw, why are people not fixing GNU Classpath upstream-first? Because, I guess, no-one is using it. At least, if they were, this bug would have been noticed. Right. I'm developing and testing with Fedora and Ubuntu on x86 and

Re: [cp-patches] Fix libjava bootstrap failure around IUCLC

2012-03-26 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 13:47 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Mark Wielaard m...@klomp.org wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 10:01 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: On 03/25/2012 05:08 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: 2012-03-25 Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com PR

Re: [cp-patches] Fix libjava bootstrap failure around IUCLC

2012-03-26 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 13:53 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote: Btw, why are people not fixing GNU Classpath upstream-first? Because, I guess, no-one is using it. At least, if they were, this bug would have been noticed.