Java you serialize a type to a byte[] whereas with the query
language you'd serialize to a string term
The serializing to a byte[] part is what the RPC libraries exist for. With a
string serialization format, you are setting all of your clients up to become
string concatenation engines with an
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 02:43 -0500, Stu Hood wrote:
Java you serialize a type to a byte[] whereas with the query
language you'd serialize to a string term
The serializing to a byte[] part is what the RPC libraries exist
I still think the query language is a good idea but I have one
negative point about it.
One of the selling point about a simple data model and access language
was that there were never issues where a query planner refused to do
the query the optimal way the user desired. For example a query
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Gary Dusbabek gdusba...@gmail.com wrote:
I still think the query language is a good idea but I have one
negative point about it.
One of the selling point about a simple data model and access language
was that there were never issues where a query planner
