In Joy of Clojure, there is a callback API to blocking API example in
the section on promises. Chouser outlines it a briefly in a
discussion on Promise/Deliver use cases here -
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Tim Daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
Axiom, a computer algebra system I maintain,
can dispatch on return type. I am looking at
the things Clojure can do that might support
the Spad language (the mathematical language
in Axiom). I could not find a way to
Hi,
Am 19.12.2010 um 11:36 schrieb nicolas.o...@gmail.com:
There is no static typing in Clojure. So the notion of return type do
not really exists.
Yes. The type system of eg. Haskell or OCaml is another layer of information,
which you don't have in Clojure. On the other, it's another bad
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 19.12.2010 um 11:36 schrieb nicolas.o...@gmail.com:
There is no static typing in Clojure. So the notion of return type do
not really exists.
Yes. The type system of eg. Haskell or OCaml is another layer of
thanks Meikel for your clarification.. I used to think loop recur almost
removed the need for TCO .. but here is a case where true TCO could be
really helpfull..
Sunil.
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 19.12.2010 um 08:30 schrieb Sunil S
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Sunil S Nandihalli
sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks Meikel for your clarification.. I used to think loop recur almost
removed the need for TCO .. but here is a case where true TCO could be
really helpfull..
If we had a (resolve-method multi args) that
Hi,
Am 19.12.2010 um 16:46 schrieb Ken Wesson:
If we had a (resolve-method multi args) that resolved dispatch and
then returned a fn that would call the method with those same args --
so ((resolve-method multi args)) = (multi args) -- then this
could be used with trampoline in cases like
Description of current plans for future releases is
at http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Common+Contrib+Build
-Stuart Sierra
clojure.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 11:06 PM, jim jim.d...@gmail.com wrote:
David,
I started looking at Logos tonight. Really nice. I like the way its
heading. Looking forward to using it.
Jim
Thanks! Next steps are:
- disequality constraints
- nominal logic
- tabling
Once those are in, I think
@Ken Wesson: do you mean something like this:
https://gist.github.com/747571
My fists stab at this technique looks kinda ugly though...
Is there a way to somehow embed the trampoline inside the recursive definition?
Is there a way to get the actual dispatch function other than
(.dispatchFn
Hi,
Am 19.12.2010 um 19:35 schrieb Robert McIntyre:
@Ken Wesson: do you mean something like this:
https://gist.github.com/747571
Maybe I'm missing something, but why don't you just call the multimethod itself
again in the trampoline fn?
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You received this message
Does anyone know how to set connection or read timeouts for clj-http?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
There have been discussions, here and elsewhere, about
whether Clojure is a Lisp. Lots of discussion centers
around facts like homoiconicity, or the REPL, or the
debate of Rich's redefinition of lisp primitives, etc.
These are arguments about the paint on the palace.
I have struggled with this
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Tim Daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
The most fundamental thing about Lisp is that there is
this universal but personal event when you suddenly
get it. This does not seem to happen with other languages.
I think it's true to some extent with most languages
Does anyone know how to set connection or read timeouts for clj-http?
I didn't see anything in the API. clj-apache-http has that option though
(setting http.socket.timeout parameter).
HTH,
--
Miki
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
Can you articulate it any better than ah hah!?
On Dec 19, 11:33 am, Tim Daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
There have been discussions, here and elsewhere, about
whether Clojure is a Lisp. Lots of discussion centers
around facts like homoiconicity, or the REPL, or the
debate of Rich's
sha-wing? :D
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 5:41 PM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you articulate it any better than ah hah!?
On Dec 19, 11:33 am, Tim Daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
There have been discussions, here and elsewhere, about
whether Clojure is a Lisp. Lots of discussion
Haskell has aha moments too. And it is not lisp.
The definition of lisp i accept is much simpler and much more
obvious: source code of the program is a valid data structure in that
language.
On Dec 19, 11:33 am, Tim Daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
There have been discussions, here and
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Vagif Verdi vagif.ve...@gmail.com wrote:
Haskell has aha moments too. And it is not lisp.
The definition of lisp i accept is much simpler and much more
obvious: source code of the program is a valid data structure in that
language.
Access to the parse tree.
On 12/19/2010 6:41 PM, javajosh wrote:
Can you articulate it any better than ah hah!?
The proper response is moo.
But I think there is a point where you get concepts
like the distinction between values and identity which
are fundamental. Whatever the event, it feels like
whatever I write is
I didn't mean to imply that other people
don't have the ah-hah! experience with
other languages. However, I have only had
the (before lisp)|(after lisp) experience
with lisp.
Your enlightenment might vary.
Rich gave his Whitehead talk and brought
up the fact that OO languages get several
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Tim Daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
I didn't mean to imply that other people
don't have the ah-hah! experience with
other languages. However, I have only had
the (before lisp)|(after lisp) experience
with lisp.
Your enlightenment might vary.
Rich
Tim Daly d...@axiom-developer.org writes:
Haskell has neat ideas but I've seen them before in lisp-based
systems. I work in a language which is strongly typed, allows
currying, is functional, etc., implemented in Common Lisp. I have
not found the ah-hah! in Haskell.
Sounds interesting,
On 12/19/2010 8:33 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
Tim Dalyd...@axiom-developer.org writes:
Haskell has neat ideas but I've seen them before in lisp-based
systems. I work in a language which is strongly typed, allows
currying, is functional, etc., implemented in Common Lisp. I have
not found the
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Tim Daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
On 12/19/2010 8:20 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Tim Dalyd...@axiom-developer.org
wrote:
I didn't mean to imply that other people
don't have the ah-hah! experience with
other languages.
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
Has everyone on this list developed a sudden allergy to plain text and
HTML? First I get pointed to a 34-minute video, and now this. A simple
bulleted list with a brief precis about each item would have sufficed;
a
On 12/19/2010 9:24 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Tim Dalyd...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
On 12/19/2010 8:20 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Tim Dalyd...@axiom-developer.org
wrote:
I didn't mean to imply that other people
don't have the
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Tim Daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
On 12/19/2010 9:24 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Tim Dalyd...@axiom-developer.org
wrote:
On 12/19/2010 8:20 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Tim
On 12/19/2010 10:21 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Tim Dalyd...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
On 12/19/2010 9:24 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Tim Dalyd...@axiom-developer.org
wrote:
On 12/19/2010 8:20 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19,
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Tim Daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
On 12/19/2010 10:21 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Tim Dalyd...@axiom-developer.org
wrote:
On 12/19/2010 9:24 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Tim
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:24:42 -0500
Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Tim Daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
On 12/19/2010 8:20 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Tim Dalyd...@axiom-developer.org
wrote:
I didn't mean to
On 12/19/2010 10:53 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Tim Dalyd...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
On 12/19/2010 10:21 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Tim Dalyd...@axiom-developer.org
wrote:
On 12/19/2010 9:24 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19,
2010/12/20 Tim Daly d...@axiom-developer.org
On 12/19/2010 10:53 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Tim Dalyd...@axiom-developer.org
wrote:
On 12/19/2010 10:21 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Tim Dalyd...@axiom-developer.org
wrote:
On
Is there a natively compiled version of Clojure? Is there any plans to
do so?
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please
Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com writes:
Ah. So, like the confused situations you get with Java's mutable
collections. Two lists are equal if they have the same contents in the
same order -- but then you use one as a key in a hashmap, and then add
an item to it, and boom! Clojure separates this
35 matches
Mail list logo
