Hi,
On 2 Feb., 08:44, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
This also means that macros should not use list? to test whether an
object is a nonatomic s-expression. Unfortunately core doesn't contain
a compact test for atomicity; to get all the list-y things that print
as (foo bar baz ...) you
I think what a Ring middleware[1] does might be very close what you
want to do with AOP. Clojure has a natural way to decorate an
existing body of code using higher order functions and macros.
[1] http://github.com/mmcgrana/ring
Could you share some use cases that you want to achieve with AOP?
On Feb 2, 2:09 pm, Nebojsa Stricevic nebojsa.strice...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Are there any general purpose libraries/frameworks with nice API/DSL
for Aspect Oriented Programming for Clojure? Or is there someone
working on it? Is it needed? Possible?
I agree with Shantanu and feel that Ring
Hello,
What's wrong with this example?
$ cat testlongname/editor/controller/listeners/
swing_test_listeners.clj
(ns testlongname.editor.controller.listeners.swing-test-listeners
(:use clojure.contrib.monads))
(defn some-long-function-name-abdefghijklmnopqrstuvxwyz-
Hi,
I'll just throw a wild guess into the room and say that your filename
hits the filename limit imposed by the file system of your system.
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
Ive just thought up that using print-dup for records might become a
nightmare. This is because it will now matter which ns you load it
from. If it loads an ns where the constructor function isnt defined or
isnt imported, it will throw an error. This will become a nightmare
when mixes records from
Hi,
why don't you just fully qualify the constructor function? Works from
everywhere.
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are
Thanks. That is indeed what fixed it!
And macroexpand (and pr in general) should have an option to mark what is a
list and what is a cons thingy. That is confusing.
On Feb 2, 2011, at 1:48 AM, George Jahad wrote:
As usual, Meikel has the right answer. But I didn't quite get it at
first.
FYI: There is clojure.contrib.repl-utils/show
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To
I am doing some prototyping with the event processing framework Esper
(http://esper.codehaus.org/) and I'm running up against my ignorance
of clojure/java interop. I would like to create a java bean in clojure
that is visible to the Esper runtime; I found some sample Java code
that I clojurized as
You surely mean that swing_test_listeners
$some_long_function_xyx_.class is too long.
On Feb 2, 6:51 am, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
Hi,
I'll just throw a wild guess into the room and say that your filename
hits the filename limit imposed by the file system of your system.
show's a very cool function, but has a different purpose, (afaik).
It displays the structure of an instance, but not it's contents. get-
all-fields displays the contents. For example, if a is defined like
so:
(def a (partial conj [98]))
get-all-fields will show me that the parameters to
Hi,
Am 02.02.2011 um 17:30 schrieb Armando Blancas:
You surely mean that swing_test_listeners
$some_long_function_xyx_.class is too long.
Yes. This is what I implied.
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to
George this is super cool! I can't wait to see this show up in swank-clojure
*ahem* Phil.
On Feb 2, 2011, at 12:03 PM, George Jahad wrote:
show's a very cool function, but has a different purpose, (afaik).
It displays the structure of an instance, but not it's contents. get-
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
Hi,
On 2 Feb., 08:44, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
This also means that macros should not use list? to test whether an
object is a nonatomic s-expression. Unfortunately core doesn't contain
a compact test for
Actually, you should thank hiredman, for adding the original wall-hack-
field. I just wrapped some lipstick around it.
On Feb 2, 9:40 am, Dan Larkin d...@danlarkin.org wrote:
George this is super cool! I can't wait to see this show up in swank-clojure
*ahem* Phil.
On Feb 2, 2011, at 12:03
Since defining the UI in Clojure is pretty tedious process, even with
all nice interop features, I decided to write a small library to do
this more easily and in a declarative way. I was inspired by a series
of blogposts by Stuart Sierra, he wrote a wonderful macro that deals
with GridBagLayout.
Thanks for these answers. I forgot about Robert Hooke, although I've
seen it already. I don't have a real use case yet. I'm researching
Domain Specific Languages composition/combining, so AOP could be
useful. I've checked some Clojure tracing code, I'll dig into Ring
more and Robert Hooke looks
Hi All,
I've found extending-protocol to hold on to a references to records when
they're redefined.
example (defprotocol ToExtend
(foo [this]))
ToExtend
example (defrecord Extender1 [])
example.Extender1
example (extend-protocol ToExtend Extender1 (foo [this] extender1))
nil
example
Michael Ossareh ossa...@gmail.com writes:
You'll notice in the map returned after the second (extend-protocol)
that :impls has example.Extender1 listed twice. I assume this is
because they're different records, though the fact
that they share the same name is confusing (hence the example of
On Feb 1, 6:10 pm, Matthew D. Swank akopa.gmane.pos...@gmail.com
wrote:
AFAIK clojure-clr doesn't have built-in support for accessing
properties.
Ok David Miller let me know off list the existing interop handle
properties.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 18:49, Alex Osborne a...@meshy.org wrote:
Michael Ossareh ossa...@gmail.com writes:
You'll notice in the map returned after the second (extend-protocol)
that :impls has example.Extender1 listed twice. I assume this is
because they're different records, though the
Specifically, in ClojureCLR property access in CLR interop is treated
in the same way as fields and zero-arity methods.
For class properties, ClassName/PropertyName works.
For instance properties, (.PropertyName instance) or (. instance
PropertyName)
In essence, fields, properties and
I've made a change to the naming and location of AOT-compiled
assemblies generated by ClojureCLR.
Previously, ClojureCLR had followed the conventions of ClojureJVM in
naming/locating class files (assemblies in CLR-land) generated by AOT-
compilation. Thus, doing (compile 'a.b.c) would find
I've done a pass through most of the Clojure programs on the shootout
web site recently, making some of them faster, and choosing -Xmx
command line arguments when running them to keep the memory usage down
to a reasonable level -- not always the smallest heap size that works,
mind you --
Should not it be empty colection instead?
It seems odd to me since it is inconsistent and forces to consider one
more case (nil or collection).
And another question. I have written this function
(defn index-by
Make map (f x) - x
[f coll]
(reduce #(assoc %1 (f %2) %2) {} coll))
I wonder, is
Hi,
On 3 Feb., 08:04, Petr Gladkikh petrg...@gmail.com wrote:
Should not it be empty colection instead?
It seems odd to me since it is inconsistent and forces to consider one
more case (nil or collection).
It is consistent. There is a difference between () and nil. () is the
empty list.
On Feb 2, 7:43 pm, Alexander Yakushev yakushev.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Usage of the lib is very easy. Here is an example from my tetris game:
(deflayout
frame (:border)
:WEST gamepanel
:EAST (deflayout
sidepanel (:flow :TRAILING)
nextpanel
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
Hi,
On 3 Feb., 08:04, Petr Gladkikh petrg...@gmail.com wrote:
Should not it be empty colection instead?
It seems odd to me since it is inconsistent and forces to consider one
more case (nil or collection).
It is
29 matches
Mail list logo
