Opened issues for both failures, thanks
-A
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Phil Hagelberg p...@hagelb.org wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Alan Shaw noden...@gmail.com wrote:
In cygwin on win7 I get this:
Could you open an issue on Github for this?
I don't know enough about
Clojurescript doesn't have vars, so why not have def return the symbol ?
Le 15 mai 2012 à 06:14, kovas boguta kovas.bog...@gmail.com a écrit :
I think this is a pretty valid feature request.
The main question is, can this be done without having vars in clojurescript.
One way to do it is
Yeah, that is sort of what I was implying in changing the semantics of def
Though I wasn't ready to totally committed to that, since I don't
understand the properties of symbols in clojurescript.
Like, how do go from the symbol to the javascript object we've just
bound to the symbol?
On Tue,
Also discovered I can prefix `java -cp ...` with `rlwrap` to get back a nice
REPL experience.
If you want to use rlwrap, check out its options like --remember,
-c, -b and -f. Here is the script I use to run repl from the
root of the lein project:
breakchars=(){}[],^%$#@\\;:''|\\
Thanks Sean. I'll honor the Contributor's Agreement when time comes
for me to introduce some brilliant feature to Clojure core :-)
/ James
On May 14, 7:53 pm, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:41 AM, James abbott...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for the
Chris, Sean:
No Clojure dojos here but I'll be moving camp soon and will likely
start one myself. I'd like to hear what structure of dojo meetings
have people used with success? Is it more or less like this:
http://web.cs.wpi.edu/~gpollice/Dojo.html
?
/ James
On May 14, 10:21 pm, Sean
There's also nailgun: it keeps a JVM running in the background that Java
programs can connect to, eliminating JVM startup time completely. It's totally
insecure on multi-user machines and hasn't been updated in a while, but it may
be sufficient to ease the pain on developer machines.
--
You
Returning the symbol seems odd at least to me. I think the best we could do
is have a compiler flag so that defs can return nil for REPLs.
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012, kovas boguta wrote:
Yeah, that is sort of what I was implying in changing the semantics of
def
Though I wasn't ready to totally
Workaround:
(do (def foo (build-something-enormous)) nil)
As for the reason for this behaviour -- probably non other than it's
just the easiest thing for def in ClojureScript to do; it being to
inherit the return value from the JavaScript assignment def compiles
to.
Sticking a void () around
Data reader literals are not intended to replace record serialization. If
you want the flexibility to change your record types, I think you need to
use data reader literals from the beginning, and have them deserialize as
the appropriate record type.
-S
--
You received this message because
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Mads Andreas Elvheim
mads.elvh...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a few issues which are all related. I'll do my best to explain them
one by one.
I'd like to use the latest version of the jOGL library with Clojure 1.3 /
Leiningen 1.7.1 / OpenJDK 1.6.
After getting
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, JDuPreez jacques...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm new to Clojure. I've been unsuccessful in finding a clear answer or
getting it to work (might just have done it incorrectly, since I'm still
learning). I understand that you can add metadata to an object, with-meta,
and
Hi,
I am not sure whether I fully understand your question. However, when you
create a record, a second constructor will be created for you which also
expects a meta-data map:
user= (defrecord Foo (bar baz))
user= (meta (Foo. 2 3 {:foo meta} nil))
{:foo meta}
Hope that helps.
Stefan
--
Made it for a project I'm working on. Thought it'd be nice to open-source
it. It's called Snout.
https://github.com/eduardoejp/snout
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note
There seems to be a few steps involved in this from, what I'm seeing.
From what I'm seeing of the source, there's two files I'll be dealing with
closure.clj -- defines functions for looking up info about libraries,
functions, etc.
compiler.clj -- actually defines the compiler
To start with, I'm
Reasonable enough. Patch welcome.
-S
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe
It's fixed now.
On Friday, May 11, 2012 12:30:47 PM UTC-4, Sean Corfield wrote:
Just to clarify: Clojure isn't building at the moment _on
build.clojure.org_ but you can build it yourself easily enough:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure
Or maybe if-let and when-let should support multiple bindings, like the doc
states.
воскресенье, 13 мая 2012 г., 4:55:40 UTC+6 пользователь Borkdude написал:
The docstring of if-let is as follows:
bindings = binding-form test
If test is true, evaluates then with binding-form bound to the
Stefan,
Thank you for your reply. You are referring to applying an annotation to an
instance/object.
If we could imagine it existed for the moment, this is what I'd be looking
for:
(meta {:foo meta} (defrecord Foo (bar baz)))
I should then somehow be able to retrieve the metadata of the type
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Timothy Baldridge tbaldri...@gmail.com wrote:
There seems to be a few steps involved in this from, what I'm seeing.
From what I'm seeing of the source, there's two files I'll be dealing with
closure.clj -- defines functions for looking up info about libraries,
Logically the interface between the analyzer and the emitter is data
(maps, etc) which can be serialized as json or some platform specific
representation. Then all you need to do is write an emitter on your
platform of choice that can emit code for the data.
So for Python:
1. run the
I've written another post which goes into the reducers in more detail:
http://clojure.com/blog/2012/05/15/anatomy-of-reducer.html
Rich
On May 10, 2012, at 1:26 PM, Christian Romney wrote:
On Thursday, May 10, 2012 8:02:09 AM UTC-4, Nicolas Oury wrote:
I can describe the background to
I tried using if-let with multiple binding in past as well.
Following least surprise principle, I would like to see support for
multiple bindings.
Cheers,
Hubert.
Vinzent mailto:ru.vinz...@gmail.com
May 15, 2012 5:47 PM
Or maybe if-let and when-let should support multiple bindings, like
the
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Timothy Baldridge
tbaldri...@gmail.com wrote:
Logically the interface between the analyzer and the emitter is data
(maps, etc) which can be serialized as json or some platform specific
representation. Then all you need to do is write an emitter on your
If if-let and when-let don't get support for multiple bindings, you could
try https://github.com/egamble/let-else .
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:09:08 PM UTC-7, Hubert Iwaniuk wrote:
I tried using if-let with multiple binding in past as well.
Following least surprise principle, I would like to
Does the principle of least surprise suggest that multiple bindings be
combined with AND or OR?
--Aaron
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Hubert Iwaniuk neo...@kungfoo.pl wrote:
I tried using if-let with multiple binding in past as well.
Following least surprise principle, I would like to see
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 3:26:52 PM UTC-4, Aaron Cohen wrote:
Does the principle of least surprise suggest that multiple bindings be
combined with AND or OR?
For `when-let', I would expect it to work like nested when-lets:
(when-let [x (exp-1)
y (exp-2 x)
z (exp-3
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Aaron Cohen aa...@assonance.org wrote:
Does the principle of least surprise suggest that multiple bindings be
combined with AND or OR?
My own personal opinion is that it makes sense in combination with 'and',
but others may feel differently. E.g.,
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 3:41:58 PM UTC-4, Dan Cross wrote:
My own personal opinion is that it makes sense in combination with 'and',
but others may feel differently. E.g.,
(when-let [a (allocate-thing) b (read-into-thing a) c
(extract-something-from-thing b)]
I can certainly imagine cases where the analyzer might want
reflection on types etc of the given platform, but I think that is
really an optimization, trading off compile/analyzer time reflection
for runtime reflection. That platform reflective information would be
provided by something like
There's a right parenthesis missing at
http://clojure.com/blog/2012/05/15/anatomy-of-reducer.html :
Now:
(reduce + 0 (map inc [1 2 3 4]))
;;becomes
(reduce + 0 (reducer [1 2 3 4] (mapping inc)) MISSING PAREN
under the heading Reducers
sincerely,
--Robert McIntyre, Dylan Holmes
On Tue, May
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Timothy Baldridge tbaldri...@gmail.comwrote:
(defn as-str [x] (.toString x))
That can't port to Python, or really any other VM besides JS. So if
we're looking at translating the analyzer itself we have to develop
some sort of base set of libraries that every
Why can't it port to Python? You have can have an instance with a method
toString right?
The python version of that code (at least in clojure-py) would be this:
(defn as-str [x] (py/str x))
So my point is that some platforms may define toString, other define
str and still others (CLR) define
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Timothy Baldridge
tbaldri...@gmail.com wrote:
I can certainly imagine cases where the analyzer might want
reflection on types etc of the given platform, but I think that is
really an optimization, trading off compile/analyzer time reflection
for runtime
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Timothy Baldridge tbaldri...@gmail.comwrote:
Why can't it port to Python? You have can have an instance with a method
toString right?
The python version of that code (at least in clojure-py) would be this:
(defn as-str [x] (py/str x))
That would be
If if-let/when-let had multiple bindings, how would you propose to define the
condition of whether to do the then branch?
As the logical AND of all of the multiple forms? The OR? Only use the first
expression? Only the last?
I don't see that any of those is any more clear or least
On May 15, 2012, at 3:15 PM, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
If if-let/when-let had multiple bindings, how would you propose to define the
condition of whether to do the then branch?
As the logical AND of all of the multiple forms? The OR? Only use the first
expression? Only the last?
I don't
the point of the analysis step is to generate a richer (more verbose)
set of information about the code, there is a lot of information you
would like to have when compiling (for example, for some platforms it
would be nice to know at the start of a function what locals exist in
the that function,
Hello folks,
I'm happy to announce the release of clojure-encog, a thin wrapper
around Encog AI framework 3.1. Basically i did this so i could use it
for a project of mine but I guess someone else might find it useful as
well...especially if someone does not want to get down and dirty with
reloading code at the REPL, because old background threads may still be
running with old code. So I end up restarting the process many times per
day.
I usually create a 'restart fn that closes down the background threads
and services and restarts them.
This might require you to add a
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Walter Tetzner
robot.ninja.saus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 3:41:58 PM UTC-4, Dan Cross wrote:
My own personal opinion is that it makes sense in combination with 'and',
but others may feel differently. E.g.,
(when-let [a (allocate-thing)
Fixed - thanks.
Rich
On May 15, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Robert McIntyre wrote:
There's a right parenthesis missing at
http://clojure.com/blog/2012/05/15/anatomy-of-reducer.html :
Now:
(reduce + 0 (map inc [1 2 3 4]))
;;becomes
(reduce + 0 (reducer [1 2 3 4] (mapping inc)) MISSING PAREN
What is the best way to write an FilterInputStream or InputStream do
disk? I'm downloading a file using the clj-http library:
(:body (client/get
http://www.openlaszlo.org/pipermail/laszlo-dev/2012-May.txt.gz; {:as
:stream})
That returns the response body as a FilteredInputStream, which I need to
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 02:15:59AM +0200, Raju Bitter wrote:
What is the best way to write an FilterInputStream or InputStream do
disk? I'm downloading a file using the clj-http library:
(:body (client/get
http://www.openlaszlo.org/pipermail/laszlo-dev/2012-May.txt.gz; {:as
:stream})
Thanks a lot, that worked for me.
Raju
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To
I currently have a static method in Java. I have rewritten it in Clojure. I
wish to allow the rest of the Java app to call the new function with
minimal change. Still getting NumberValidator cannot be resolved even
after reading the following SO post and it's not helping for my particular
In:
https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/wiki/Differences-from-Clojure
It is written than:
You must use the :as form of :require
Does this basically mean there is no natural way to write a set of
functions and import them globally (with no namespace prefix)?
For example I would like
Sorry, meant to quote:
:use is not supported
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 8:36:24 AM UTC+3, Oded Badt wrote:
In:
https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/wiki/Differences-from-Clojure
It is written than:
You must use the :as form of :require
Does this basically mean there is no
Hi,
you are sure that your AOT compiled class files are on the classpath before
compiling the Java side?
Kind regards
Meikel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that
49 matches
Mail list logo
