cljs-info is a collection of Clojure-functions to provide basic help and
reflection facilities for ClojureScript.
Some of the functions provided are:
cljs-doc, cljs-doc*, cljs-find-doc, cljs-apropos, cljs-source
cljs-ns-map, cljs-ns-publics, cljs-ns-refers, cljs-ns-aliases,
Hi Brian
Which books had you read? I found that Clojure Programming provides
many useful tips on how organize code, etc.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Brian Craft craft.br...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm finding the books on clojure to be very focused on low-level language
features. Are there any
One thing that you might be missing is the expressive power of the sequence
handling functions (everything under sequences here:
http://clojure.org/cheatsheet ). I found it very useful to follow a few
other users in 4clojure [1] which allowed me to compare different styles in
their solutions
Congrats!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
Hi there!
I'm wondering why ClojureScript seems to handle international characters
differently from Clojure.
Simple example in Clojure (= my preferred behaviour):
user= (str ø)
ø
The same example in ClojureScript:
ClojureScript:cljs.user #_= (str 'ø')
\xF8'
Can anyone explain to me why
Hi people!
I just cloned the current clojurescript repo, in a Windows 2008 server
machine, and follow the instructions:
https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/wiki/Windows-Setup
https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/wiki/Quick-Start
But when I run .\script\repl.bat and tried (require
Hopefully someone else can answer why there is a difference in the output of
the str function. I suspect in ClojureScript's case, it is simply the default
behavior to use \x and two hex digits to display a character in a string with a
code point in the range 128 through 255, inherited from
Thanks for your reply Andy!
BRgds,
Henrik
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:17:22 PM UTC+2, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
Hopefully someone else can answer why there is a difference in the output
of the str function. I suspect in ClojureScript's case, it is simply the
default behavior to use \x and
I have some Javascript on a website that pings my Clojure app. My app adds
in the user info like this:
(defn add-to-logged-in-registry [this-users-params]
We assume some user is looking at a site such as wpquestions.com and the
Javascript on that site is sending an Ajax request to this app,
Presets have been implemented in the latest version.
It's selectable in the plugin options.
The clojure preset should make LispIndent more or less exactly emacs.
(I think, I still haven't tested emacs - will check out your guide soon
John :) )
Jonathan
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:55 AM, John
larry google groups lawrencecloj...@gmail.com writes:
(let [right-now (. (Date.) getTime)
new-user-entry (conj this-users-params { updated right-now })]
(swap! registry (fn [map-of-user-maps]
(assoc (assoc map-of-user-maps (get new-user-entry
username
Does new-user-entry include a username entry that points to nil? get only
uses default value if the key is not present:
user= (get {:x nil} :x :not-found)
nil
user= (get {:x nil} :y :not-found)
:not-found
user= (or (get {:x nil} :x) :not-found)
:not-found
user=
On Oct 18, 2012, at 10:11 AM,
Which books on Clojure have you read so far?
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Brian Craft craft.br...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm finding the books on clojure to be very focused on low-level language
features. Are there any good references for how to design code in clojure
(or perhaps in functional
I'm following clojure's LispReader implementation in blind, you should ask
that question to clojure devs
2012/10/14 AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com
Hi!
What would you do about this ?
https://github.com/quil/quil/commit/d0312f0f119db066a8d613dec8803571b92bea39
Would you edit the file or change the
In these days I've released a new version of neurotic
To use it simply put on your project.clj
[bronsa/neurotic 0.3.3]
With the 0.3.3 release neurotic fully supports implementing deftrait from:
deftype, defrecor, extend and extend-type.
Error messages has also been improved.
A new version of
Okay, this is very confusing to me. If I try this:
(defn add-to-logged-in-registry [this-users-params]
(let [right-now (. (Date.) getTime)
new-user-entry (conj this-users-params { updated right-now })]
(swap! registry (fn [map-of-user-maps]
(conj
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:16 AM, larry google groups
lawrencecloj...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, this is very confusing to me. If I try this:
(defn add-to-logged-in-registry [this-users-params]
(let [right-now (. (Date.) getTime)
new-user-entry (conj this-users-params { updated
I tried your code and got the expected result:
user (def registry (atom {}))
#'user/registry
user (import 'java.util.Date)
java.util.Date
user (defn add-to-logged-in-registry [this-users-params]
(let [right-now (. (Date.) getTime)
new-user-entry (conj this-users-params { updated
Interesting. I am using Clojure 1.3. And I'm using clojure-jack-in inside
of emacs. What are you using?
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 11:22:26 AM UTC-4, Sean Corfield wrote:
I tried your code and got the expected result:
user (def registry (atom {}))
#'user/registry
user (import
Hi Everybody,
class name clashes on importing same named classes from different
java-packages into same clojure namespace. Is this expected. I think that
it should be possible to import them and can be used by completely
qualifying the class name with the appropriate java-package name.
Thanks,
Am I doing it wrong ? is there a way to get around this?.. I guess I
pressed the send button before I completed the email..
Thanks,
Sunil.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Sunil S Nandihalli
sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everybody,
class name clashes on importing same named classes
Sunil S Nandihalli sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com writes:
Hi!
class name clashes on importing same named classes from different
java-packages into same clojure namespace. Is this expected.
Yes, that's expected. Import the one you are using more frequently and
access the other one qualified.
it
On 18/10/12 16:27, Sunil S Nandihalli wrote:
Hi Everybody,
class name clashes on importing same named classes from different
java-packages into same clojure namespace. Is this expected. I think
that it should be possible to import them and can be used by
completely qualifying the class name
I'm not sure if anyone's already done this, but I recently got tired of
writing code that looked like this:
(let [a 1]
(ns cljutils.core)
(defn- form-check
Ensures the form represents an assignment.
Such as (:= a 1)
[form]
(and
(= 3 (count form))
(= := (first form))
(symbol?
thanks tassillo, that fixed it .. I didn't know that we can use the classes
with out importing them.
Sunil.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Tassilo Horn t...@gnu.org wrote:
Sunil S Nandihalli sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com writes:
Hi!
class name clashes on importing same named classes from
Thanks Jim,
That fixed the issue. I did not know that I can access the classes without
importing them..
Sunil.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Jim foo.bar jimpil1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/10/12 16:27, Sunil S Nandihalli wrote:
Hi Everybody,
class name clashes on importing same named
Clojure Programming, and The Joy of ...
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 7:53:38 AM UTC-7, Sean Corfield wrote:
Which books on Clojure have you read so far?
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Brian Craft craft...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I'm finding the books on clojure to be very focused
I'm not sure if anyone's done this before, but I'm fed up with writing code
that looks like this:
(let [a 1]
(println this is a: a)
(let [b 2]
(println this is b: b)
(let [c 3]
(println this is c: c)
(+ a b c
I'd rather do something more like
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:01 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if anyone's done this before, but I'm fed up with writing
code that looks like this:
What problem does this solve given you can do the following?
(let [a 1
_ (println a)
b 2
_ (println b)
c
I'm confused. How does the following not work?
(let [a 1 b 2 c 3]
(println a)
(println b)
(println c)
(+ a b c))
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 5:01:33 PM UTC+1, JvJ wrote:
I'm not sure if anyone's done this before, but I'm fed up with writing
code that looks like this:
(let [a 1]
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:12 AM, keeds akee...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm confused. How does the following not work?
(let [a 1 b 2 c 3]
(println a)
(println b)
(println c)
(+ a b c))
It works, but all of the expressions on the RHS of the let
expression's binding vector have to be applied
I didn't realize you could bind to empty identifiers like that. Alright,
that makes more sense. I figured I was missing something.
On Thursday, 18 October 2012 12:11:49 UTC-4, David Nolen wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:01 PM, JvJ kfjwh...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
I'm not sure if
Exactly. A big part of the reason was that I needed to do things between
when other variables were initialized.
On Thursday, 18 October 2012 12:17:17 UTC-4, Ben wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:12 AM, keeds ake...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
I'm confused. How does the following not
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:23 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't realize you could bind to empty identifiers like that. Alright,
that makes more sense. I figured I was missing something.
Just to be clear _ has not special meaning beyond convention. I could have
used x but that
There's nothing special going on, no empty identifiers. It's just a
common convention to use _ when uninterested in the return value.
(let [_ 1]
_)
;= 1
Pretty evil to actually use bindings called _ though :)
Thanks,
Ambrose
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:23 AM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not just you. I'm also surprised at the amount of syntax and the
number of ways of doing some things. I suspect that if you come from java
or C++ it seems like a simple language, but it feels pretty cluttered
compared to other languages. The '-' macro, for example. I've learned to
read
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:18:09 AM UTC-4, Jonathan Fischer Friberg
wrote:
Presets have been implemented in the latest version.
It's selectable in the plugin options.
Works nicely. Thanks, Jonathan!
BTW, I created the beginnings of a CDS development tools guide
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:26 AM, larry google groups
lawrencecloj...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting. I am using Clojure 1.3. And I'm using clojure-jack-in inside
of emacs. What are you using?
I was using Clojure 1.4 via jack-in from emacs. I just tried it again with
lein repl in a clean
On 18/10/12 17:37, Brian Craft wrote:
It's not just you. I'm also surprised at the amount of syntax and the
number of ways of doing some things. I suspect that if you come from
java or C++ it seems like a simple language, but it feels pretty
cluttered compared to other languages. The '-'
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Brian Craft craft.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Clojure Programming, and The Joy of ...
Hmm, I was going to suggest Joy of but if you don't think that helps with
some of those design issues, I'm not sure what to suggest. Others suggested
Clojure Programming but,
Brian,
Those are two excellent books. If you are looking at more general project
organization and approaches, I'd suggest:
- Just Enough Architecture (specifically its discussion on architectural
evident coding)
- watch the Halloway talks on evident code
- thumb through Ring, Leiningen, and
I came very recently to clojure, having crossed CL in the 80's, c/c++ in
the 90's and java in the 00's. A long travel to find with clojure a kind of
very comfortable destination very close to where I started from + seqs
and laziness.
thanks Rich, and all of you too to brought me back on joy
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Paul deGrandis paul.degran...@gmail.comwrote:
- thumb through Ring, Leiningen, and ClojureScript as prime examples of
well written Clojure applications
+1
I think it's informative to look at non-trivial yet small Clojure
libraries. ClojureScript doesn't
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Brian Craft craft.br...@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect that if you come from java or C++ it seems like a simple
language, but it feels pretty cluttered compared to other languages.
Interesting observation and probably true. Although I did Lisp back at
university
See Functional Programming for the Object-Oriented Programmer (
https://leanpub.com/fp-oo)
Il giorno 18/ott/2012 19:01, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Brian Craft craft.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Clojure Programming, and The Joy of ...
Hmm, I
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:
Clojure feels like a VERY simple language with almost no
syntax. Having recently read more Scheme / CL code, I can see how folks
coming from those languages think Clojure is cluttered.
Why do they think it is
It is; *data_readers.clj*
{db/id datomic.db/id-literal
db/fn datomic.function/construct
base64 datomic.codec/base-64-literal}
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Robert Luo l...@basecity.com wrote:
Is #db/id defined in datomic library?
--
You received this message because you are
Thank you for this clarification!
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:26 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:23 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't realize you could bind to empty identifiers like that. Alright,
that makes more sense. I figured I was
(cons 1 nil)
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Curtis cur...@ram9.cc wrote:
Cons seems to be strange
How do i use Cons with an atom to make a list?
(cons 1 1)
On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 5:08:26 PM UTC-7, Baishampayan Ghose wrote:
`car` is called `first` here and `cdr` could mean
For the situation where the lets are nested because you're checking the
values in some way after each binding, I wrote a macro called let?. I find
it very useful and use it in nearly all my
code. https://github.com/egamble/let-else
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:11 AM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:01 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if anyone's done this before, but I'm fed up with writing
code that looks like this:
What problem does this solve given you can do the
It's rare to get tired of this, because nobody does it: it's not
common because your interleaved statements are side-effecting only,
which is not encouraged in Clojure, and rarely needed. Certainly
sometimes it's the best way to do something, but not so often that I'd
become frustrated; if
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Alan Malloy a...@malloys.org wrote:
It's rare to get tired of this, because nobody does it: it's not
common because your interleaved statements are side-effecting only,
which is not encouraged in Clojure, and rarely needed. Certainly
sometimes it's the best way
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Alan Malloy a...@malloys.org wrote:
It's rare to get tired of this, because nobody does it: it's not
common because your interleaved statements are side-effecting only,
which is not encouraged in Clojure, and rarely needed. Certainly
sometimes it's the best
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:11 AM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:01 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if anyone's done this before, but I'm fed up with writing
code that
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
(- ((fn []
(let [a 1]
(println this is a: a)
a)))
((fn [a]
(let [b 2]
(println this is b: b)
(list a b
((fn [[a b]]
(let [c 3]
(println this is c:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Alan Malloy a...@malloys.org wrote:
It's rare to get tired of this, because nobody does it: it's not
common because your interleaved statements are side-effecting only,
which is not
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:07 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
(- ((fn []
(let [a 1]
(println this is a: a)
a)))
((fn [a]
(let [b 2]
(println this is b: b)
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Ben Wolfson wolf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
It isn't side effecting it is sequencing.
Clojure's let is already sequential, like Scheme's let*: The bindings
are sequential, so each binding can see
On Oct 18, 12:02 pm, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Alan Malloy a...@malloys.org wrote:
It's rare to get tired of this, because nobody does it: it's not
common because your interleaved statements are side-effecting only,
which is not encouraged in
When I want to add print commands for debugging, I usually either do it the
way David Nolen described, i.e., binding _ to a printf statement, or I use
a little utility macro like this (picked up from stackoverflow):
(defmacro dbg[x] `(let [x# ~x] (println dbg: '~x = x#) x#))
I agree with Evan
Congratulations Rich. Many thanks to you and the many people that have
contributed to making Clojure what it is today.
Learning and using Clojure has truly brought the joy back to creating
software and I needed that!
Best,
Brian
On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 8:53:55 PM UTC-5, Rich Hickey
Alright, Eli. You've piqued my interest. I'll have to take a closer look
sometime soon.
~Gary
On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 10:22:54 AM UTC-4, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Gary Johnson gwjohnso at uvm.edu writes:
I see. After taking a closer look, I can see that you could do LP in
Scribble
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
Either way works well. I think Evan's way results in somewhat more compact
code for the common case, whereas Cgrand's way feels a little more versatile
(and his flatter cond is what I use). I strongly urge you to
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
Either way works well. I think Evan's way results in somewhat more
compact
code for the common case, whereas Cgrand's way feels a little
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:17 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
Either way works well. I think Evan's way results in somewhat more
bravo!
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Brian Kirkbride
br...@otherpeoplespixels.com wrote:
Congratulations Rich. Many thanks to you and the many people that have
contributed to making Clojure what it is today.
Learning and using Clojure has truly brought the joy back to creating
software
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
When you use def inside a defn is it equivalent to a let binding like this?
(defn foo []
(def a 1)
(println a))
(defn foo []
((fn [a]
(println a)) 1))
Not equivalent.
--
You received this message because
You probably want to watch this:
vimeo.com/46163090
Also, try to think of your programs in terms of pipelines as much as
possible.
You get input, you produce output.
That probably applies to every program ever written, but when you get how
that works in Clojure, it's like an enlightment, at
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:32 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
When you use def inside a defn is it equivalent to a let binding like
this?
(defn foo []
(def a 1)
(println a))
(defn foo []
((fn [a]
A def, even inside defn, creates and binds a global variable.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
A def, even inside defn, creates and binds a global variable.
Woa, I see, thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
A def, even inside defn, creates and binds a global variable.
Woa, I see, thanks!
Anyone voted for internal define lately?
--
You received
On Oct 17, 2012, at 2:35 PM, Andreas Liljeqvist wrote:
Just to clear something up: Are you maintaining midje-mode?
I thought it was Dmitri?
That's where I left my pull request anyway.
I'm a committer for `midje-mode`.
-
Brian Marick, Artisanal Labrador
Contract programming in Ruby and
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
A def, even inside defn, creates and binds a global variable.
Woa, I
Exactly. Not only debugging, but java interop that involved calling
methods with side effects.
On Thursday, 18 October 2012 15:02:47 UTC-4, David Nolen wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Alan Malloy al...@malloys.orgjavascript:
wrote:
It's rare to get tired of this, because nobody
I figured you would use doto for that.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:09 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
Exactly. Not only debugging, but java interop that involved calling methods
with side effects.
On Thursday, 18 October 2012 15:02:47 UTC-4, David Nolen wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:05 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
Anyone voted for internal define lately?
At this point I think it's highly unlikely to change - the behavior is
pretty well documented:
I see. Just a
On a side note, I was partially inspired by Haskell's do notation, which is
imperative-looking syntactic sugar for monadic binds.
On Thursday, 18 October 2012 12:01:33 UTC-4, JvJ wrote:
I'm not sure if anyone's done this before, but I'm fed up with writing
code that looks like this:
(let
On a side note, I was partially inspired by Haskell's do notation, which is
imperative-looking syntactic sugar for monadic bind operators.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Most of what could be accomplished by an internal define could be done with
a let statement. But if you don't want to add the brackets, you can create
your own function definition macro that converts defs to lets.
On Thursday, 18 October 2012 17:12:04 UTC-4, Grant Rettke wrote:
On Thu, Oct
The doto form is great, but as far as I know, it only lets you thread a
single object. I'm looking at creating several objects consecutively.
On Thursday, 18 October 2012 17:11:08 UTC-4, Grant Rettke wrote:
I figured you would use doto for that.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:09 PM, JvJ
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
Anyone voted for internal define lately?
On the one hand, internal define would be nice because it would help
alleviate the nested let problem and possibly be more intuitive for
newcomers.
On the other hand, sometimes
deja-vu :)
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:16 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
On a side note, I was partially inspired by Haskell's do notation, which
is imperative-looking syntactic sugar for monadic bind operators.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Now I remember the more important video:
www.infoq.com/presentations/Thinking-in-Data
Also (haven't watched):
www.infoq.com/presentations/Programming-with-Values-in-Clojure
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send
It's slightly different, but libraries such as Flow or Prismatic's Graph
can be used to achieve a similar effect.
Flow: https://github.com/stuartsierra/flow
Graph:
http://blog.getprismatic.com/blog/2012/10/1/prismatics-graph-at-strange-loop.html
Example using Flow:
(def the-flow
(flow b
Hello!
I've recently started playing with Clojure, and a couple of days ago I've
been pointed to Reducers in Clojure 1.5 after a discussion on #clojure at
Freenode.
I've read Rich's posts announcing the Reducers library, and he says that
there's a ***lack of reducible IO sources***. I'm
Damn, just noticed a small mistake in the macro: I use the original buffer,
not the duplicated one. Here's the correct version:
(defmacro buffer-reduce [b f val]
`(let [b# (.duplicate ~b)]
(loop [remaining# (.remaining b#)
result# ~val]
(if (zero? remaining#)
Bit of a late reaction, but there is nothing special about a tag with a
namespace prefixed. For example I have been using:
(zf/xml- zipper :ListRecords :record :metadata :oai_dc:dc :dc:language
zf/text)
which works perfectly well.
Maurits
Op zondag 22 juli 2012 22:02:59 UTC+2 schreef Marcel
As a general-macro aside, you are multiply-evaluating the `f`
argument, by expanding it in-place inside the recursive clause. This
is almost certainly not what you want, and you could avoid it by
starting with (let [f# ~f] ...). Better still, ask why this is a macro
at all. This should really just
Another java newbie question, I expect. I tried using jvisualvm to profile
my clojure app. It's spending all its time in
jdbc.util.ReadAheadInputStream.fill(). The call tree points to
clojure-agent-send-off-pool-n. I'm not sure what this is telling me.
--
You received this message because you
Thanks to everyone for the suggestions!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To
Thanks for the input. Didn't know that I was multiply-evaluating f.
The reason why I wrote a macro instead of a function is because 'get' and
'duplicate' are not declared in any common superclass of the different
buffers, so I was getting lots of reflection!
Are there alternatives to the macro
2012/10/18 Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.com
When I want to add print commands for debugging, I usually either do it
the way David Nolen described, i.e., binding _ to a printf statement, or I
use a little utility macro like this (picked up from stackoverflow):
(defmacro dbg[x] `(let
2012/10/19 Bruno França dos Reis bfr...@gmail.com
The reason why I wrote a macro instead of a function is because 'get' and
'duplicate' are not declared in any common superclass of the different
buffers, so I was getting lots of reflection!
Are there alternatives to the macro that avoid
C is a C-language, and it seems a lot simpler than clojure to me. KR is
about 200 pages. I expect you mean C++, Java, etc. Not meaning to start a
language war, but my own experiences with C++ and Java have mostly
convinced me that the added complexity in those languages don't lead to
better
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Herwig Hochleitner
hhochleit...@gmail.comwrote:
2012/10/19 Bruno França dos Reis bfr...@gmail.com
The reason why I wrote a macro instead of a function is because 'get' and
'duplicate' are not declared in any common superclass of the different
buffers, so I
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Herwig Hochleitner
hhochleit...@gmail.comwrote:
FWIW, when just wanting to print out debug values, I use a custom reader
tag similar to the above macro:
(let [x #log/spy (+ a b)]
(usage-of x))
That's nice! I haven't done anything with reader macros.
OK, just looked it up and realized that it's just how # works, and not a
special kind of macro.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Herwig Hochleitner
hhochleit...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, when just wanting to print
So, the current version, after the suggestion by Alan Malloy, is the
following:
(defmacro buffer-reduce [b f val]
`(let [b# (.duplicate ~b)
f# ~f]
(loop [remaining# (.remaining b#)
result# ~val]
(if (zero? remaining#)
result#
(recur (dec
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
