On my repl into is consistently faster.
What versions of clojure, java and the OS are you running?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are
Hi, I'm using Clojure1.4.0, Java1.6 on MacOS.
user= (clojure-version)
1.4.0
~ satoru$ java -version
java version 1.6.0_35
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_35-b10-428-11M3811)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.10-b01-428, mixed mode)
On Sunday, November 4, 2012
Thank you Stephen,
the problem is that it is impossible to create create a Java class using
closure with the following characteristics:
1) all methods must match given Java signature. For example, if I need a
method
public String getSomeString();
all I get is
public Object getSomeString();
I get big fluctuation in results for bot naive-into and into, ranging from
400ms to 1500ms.
This is probably because of the GC kicking in and influencing timings.
Changing timings to something like:
(System/gc) (time (do (into #{} (range 1e6)) nil))
and
(System/gc) (time (do (naive-into #{}
ru@ru-maclin:~/ProtegeClojureOMTabs-1.5/lib_ext$ java -jar
clojure-1.4.0.jar
Clojure 1.4.0
user= (read-string 07)
7
user= (read-string 09)
NumberFormatException Invalid number: 09
clojure.lang.LispReader.readNumber (LispReader.java:253)
user= (read-string 08)
NumberFormatException Invalid
Thank you, Bronsa!
Sincerely,
Ru
воскресенье, 4 ноября 2012 г., 14:27:30 UTC+4 пользователь Bronsa написал:
Number prefixed by 0 are read by the clojure reader as octals.
So the decimal 8 is 010
2012/11/4 ru sor...@oogis.ru javascript:
ru@ru-maclin:~/ProtegeClojureOMTabs-1.5/lib_ext$
On Sunday, November 4, 2012 6:20:37 PM UTC+8, Marko Kocić wrote:
I get big fluctuation in results for bot naive-into and into, ranging from
400ms to 1500ms.
This is probably because of the GC kicking in and influencing timings.
Changing timings to something like:
(System/gc) (time (do
On Sunday, November 4, 2012 11:41:23 AM UTC+1, Satoru Logic wrote:
On Sunday, November 4, 2012 6:20:37 PM UTC+8, Marko Kocić wrote:
I get big fluctuation in results for bot naive-into and into, ranging
from 400ms to 1500ms.
This is probably because of the GC kicking in and influencing
BTW, I can't even reproduce the examples here:
http://clojure.org/Transients#toc5
On Sunday, November 4, 2012 6:49:50 PM UTC+8, Marko Kocić wrote:
On Sunday, November 4, 2012 11:41:23 AM UTC+1, Satoru Logic wrote:
On Sunday, November 4, 2012 6:20:37 PM UTC+8, Marko Kocić wrote:
I get
It would be nice if clojure.core/conj had a unary implementation
([coll] coll)
I support this. Reasons:
1. It makes sense, adding nothing to something should give back the
something.
2. It's consistent with disj as mentioned.
3. Supporting edge cases like this can make some algorithms
Hi gurus,
I wonder if there are any means that'd help me translate Java sources to
Clojure? I do not expect getting working Closure code OOTB, just anything
to start from.
Regards,
Vladimir
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to
Why do you want this? If you have java code you can just call it from
clojure.no need for translation
Am 04.11.2012 19:39 schrieb Vladimir Tsichevski tsichev...@gmail.com:
Hi gurus,
I wonder if there are any means that'd help me translate Java sources to
Clojure? I do not expect getting
Hi Maik,
no, I need to re-implement existing code in Clojure.
Why do you want this? If you have java code you can just call it from
clojure.no need for translation
Am 04.11.2012 19:39 schrieb Vladimir Tsichevski
tsich...@gmail.comjavascript:
:
Hi gurus,
I wonder if there are any means
A direct translation is often not a good idea because java uses so much
mutable stateand this is really not idiomatic in clojure.but it will be a
helpful experience to make the java code to functional clojure code.
IMO calling java code from clojure is better as a direct translation with
all that
On Sunday, November 4, 2012 12:43:22 AM UTC+1, Ben wrote:
There might be a reason to write (apply f coll seqable) in a situation
in which f might be conj, though.
One may use (reduce f coll seqable) instead, if that makes sense
semantically in that context.
--
You received this message
Hello,
Clojure (by the way, it is not spelled closure) is not really designed to
generate pure-Java classes. `gen-class` is slightly more flexible than
`deftype`, but it will still generate references to Clojure classes.
If the structure of your Java classes is defined by interfaces, `deftype`
Hi gurus.
Is it possible in Clojure to use pattern matching, like I can with Bigloo
scheme, for example:
(match-case '(a b a)
((?x ?x) 'foo)
((?x ?- ?x) 'bar))
Regards,
Vladimir
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this
Hello,
It is not really possible to make a direct translation from Java to
Clojure. Java has mutable variables and imperative flow-control, for which
there is no equivalent in Clojure.
-S
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to
Use core.match: https://github.com/clojure/core.match
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Vladimir Tsichevski
tsichev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi gurus.
Is it possible in Clojure to use pattern matching, like I can with Bigloo
scheme, for example:
(match-case '(a b a)
((?x ?x) 'foo)
((?x ?-
Hi Stuart.
On Monday, November 5, 2012 1:10:36 AM UTC+4, Stuart Sierra wrote:
Hello,
It is not really possible to make a direct translation from Java to
Clojure. Java has mutable variables and imperative flow-control, for which
there is no equivalent in Clojure.
-S
That's why I'm
Hi Moritz,
this looks promising. Do you know where can I get any
documentation/examples for this module?
Regards,
Vladimir
On Monday, November 5, 2012 1:10:59 AM UTC+4, Moritz Ulrich wrote:
Use core.match: https://github.com/clojure/core.match
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Vladimir
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 13:18 -0800, Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
That's why I'm looking for means which could HELP me rewrite my code
base to Clojure, not to produce compilable and runnable code. Just
parse Java syntax tree and pretty-print it back as Clojure-like text.
I think the thesis of this
These are my results using (dotimes (time (dotimes ...))) combo to get
consistent results:
- on sets:
(dotimes [i 10] (time (dotimes [j 100] (into #{} (range 1e4)
Elapsed time: 388.595226 msecs
Elapsed time: 406.666801 msecs
Elapsed time: 421.559753 msecs
Elapsed time: 444.719263 msecs
At the wiki: https://github.com/clojure/core.match/wiki :-)
Marek.
On Sunday, November 4, 2012 11:03:40 PM UTC+1, Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
Hi Moritz,
this looks promising. Do you know where can I get any
documentation/examples for this module?
Regards,
Vladimir
On Monday, November
Excellent! Thanks!
On Monday, November 5, 2012 2:12:16 AM UTC+4, Marek Šrank wrote:
At the wiki: https://github.com/clojure/core.match/wiki :-)
Marek.
On Sunday, November 4, 2012 11:03:40 PM UTC+1, Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
Hi Moritz,
this looks promising. Do you know where can I get
On Nov 4, 2012, at 1:10 PM, Stuart Sierra wrote:
Hello,
It is not really possible to make a direct translation from Java to Clojure.
Java has mutable variables and imperative flow-control, for which there is no
equivalent in Clojure.
-S
First, some suggestions that are not
I created CLJ-1103 and attached a patch that makes this change, as well as
related changes to conj! assoc assoc! and dissoc! (dissoc, disj and disj!
already handled these cases).
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1103
Andy
On Nov 4, 2012, at 5:52 AM, Jonathan Fischer Friberg wrote:
It
Well darn it.
Had a detailed response ready to go and found that GG does not save drafts.
POS. Movin on.
The upshot was I tried predicting tick data (see attachment) with a model
pretty much identical to the one given here with little real success.
It would only resolve if I removed all of the
I can get more consistent results when running the examples in Ubuntu.
On Monday, November 5, 2012 6:09:25 AM UTC+8, Marek Šrank wrote:
These are my results using (dotimes (time (dotimes ...))) combo to get
consistent results:
- on sets:
(dotimes [i 10] (time (dotimes [j 100] (into #{}
That's just the thing - I'm not using the encog 3rd party library. I wrote
*github.com/twashing/nn* completely from scratch.
I did have the idea that maybe bid, ask and volume were not enough data
with which to make reliable predictions. So I'll also try adding 3, 5, and
7 tick running averages
Say you are given a vector A=[a1 a2 a3 a4] by some function/library/Java
call/whatever.
You want to use A in some function F that expects the values a1 a2 a3 a4
but not in the form of A; for example (defn F [w x y z] (+ w x y z)).
Is there some function G that you can use on A such that (F (G
Hello,
my current lein-ritz (0.5.0) setup, started with slime-connect, hangs when
handling Unicode characters, e.g.
user (def a \uD83D\uDE1F) ; UTF-16 representation of Unicode 4 WORRIED
FACE
#'clojure.core/a
user a
?
The REPL is hung at this point: in the the mini buffer I see error in
32 matches
Mail list logo
