intellij can do exactly what you want
2013/6/7 Moocar anthony.mar...@gmail.com
Hi all,
Diffs for clojure code (and lisps in general) can be hard to read. Every
time we wrap a form, any lines below are indented. The resulting diff just
shows that you've deleted lines and added lines, even
I made a fork of clojuredocs for the Overtone project (which is here -
http://overtone-docs.herokuapp.com/). I'm happy to try something similar
for core.logic if it would be useful. First on my list is getting Clojure
1.4 and 1.5 onto clojuredocs though...
If you want to try it yourself, repos
Thanks a lot, Alex. It works for me too.
Thanks,
ramesh
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:26 PM, ronen nark...@gmail.com wrote:
Iv used Alex version and works great (on that note thank you Alex for
keeping it going)
Ronen
On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 11:45:13 AM UTC+3, Alex Ott wrote:
Hi
Hi all, I'm super tired, so apologies if this has already been covered, but
I think portability is the main issue. Java is very portable, whereas the
CLR is focused on a single platform.
Also, most of the innovations in the Clojure space have been built on top
of the JVM. Until Clojure reaches
I have developed a library which places Java objects into clojure vars.
This is all working nicely, but I would like to documentation look up to
work as normal. I *could* add documentation using the normal metadata
facilities, but this is not ideal because the Java object itself
contains
I went ahead and made a start here:
http://corelogicdocs.herokuapp.com/
It will probably have a few bugs but it's a start at least.
Google Groups seems to be deleting my posts so I'm hoping this gets through.
Thanks,
On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 6:08:06 PM UTC+1, Benjamin Peter wrote:
Hello,
Visual Studio and all around it is almost the only point why people use
CLR. If language does not have VS integration (or integration is basic)
there is no point to restrict yourself to CLR and this makes people to go
with JVM versions of language as this give more wider options for
Hello everyone,
I found that a vector being associative really enlightening and
useful. But merge-with and other functions don't work, even though I
think it is not unreasonable to expect that. That is because
(seq [1 2 3 4]) is the seq of Long while (seq {0 1, 1 2, 2 3, 3
4}) is a seq of
In a fit of altruism, I decided to go ahead and do it myself.
http://corelogicdocs.herokuapp.com/
This is the result of an hour's work and some find-and-replace so I fully
expect it to be broken in all kinds of ways, but it's a start :)
On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 6:08:06 PM UTC+1, Benjamin
DRW (http://drw.com) is looking for a Sr. Software Engineer - Clojure/JRuby
more info:
http://drw.submit4jobs.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=83084.viewjobdetailCID=83084JID=149069
My experience working for DRW:
http://blog.jayfields.com/2013/04/year-five.html
Drop me a line if you want more info.
Hi Jay,
I'm interested in DRW, but am pretty sure the offices are in New York /
Chicago right? I'm not sure I could convince my significant other to move
away from the Bay Area.
I've been working with Runa for a year, have a lot of experience with
testing and JVM languages.
Github:
Thanks for remembering gui-diff Denis :)
I actually left it out of my post, having forgotten about it, even though I
use it multiple times a day, and couldn't get by without it in my workflow
anymore.
Best,
Alex
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Dennis Haupt d.haup...@gmail.com wrote:
intellij
Fixes:
-
* variadic aset
* CLJS-513: fix out bound behavior for vectors
* CLJS-515: emit positional factories for deftype
* IReduce for primitive arrays and lists
Changes:
-
* CLJS-499: ObjMap deprecated in favor of PersistentArrayMap
Enhancements:
-
* Added
I've modified clojure.core/destructure to support this new binding
syntax.
https://gist.github.com/doffltmiw/5730721
Here are some tests:
(let2 [[(a map?) b] [{:p 1} 2]]
[a b])
;= [{:p1 1} 2]
(let2 [[(a map?) b] [2]]
[a b])
;= [nil 2]
(let2 [[(a map? {:p default}) b] [2]]
[a b])
;= [{:p
I am very stupid and I am having trouble figuring out how to read
this:
(defmacro match-func [ body] `(fn [~'x] (match [~'x] ~@body)))
((match-func [q :guard even?] (+ 1 q) [z] (* 7 z)) 33)
;; 231
What? Why 231?
The article is here:
http://java.dzone.com/articles/my-first-clojure-macro
I
Hi,
I'm writting Clojure code that is used by a Java framework (Fitnesse's slim
for those who knows).
To workflow is like this:
Instanciation of a new Java objectf = new Foo()Initialization with
settersf.setBar(ze
bar)And then call some methodsf.baz()
My solution is something like:
(ns Foo
sounds fun, have you seen this yet?
http://cemerick.com/2011/07/05/flowchart-for-choosing-the-right-clojure-type-definition-form/
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Denis Labaye denis.lab...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm writting Clojure code that is used by a Java framework (Fitnesse's
slim for
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Ben Wolfson wolf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:09 AM, larry google groups
lawrencecloj...@gmail.com wrote:
I am very stupid and I am having trouble figuring out how to read
this:
(defmacro match-func [ body] `(fn [~'x] (match [~'x]
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Alex Baranosky
alexander.barano...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for remembering gui-diff Denis :)
You never officially announced it (didn't see anyway). So here it is :-)
My most valuable Clojure dev tool (along with clojure.tools/trace. And wait
... Incanter also,
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Gary Trakhman gary.trakh...@gmail.comwrote:
sounds fun, have you seen this yet?
http://cemerick.com/2011/07/05/flowchart-for-choosing-the-right-clojure-type-definition-form/
wicked cool
thx
I'll do this then :
(deftype Foo [^{:volatile-mutable true} x]
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Lee Spector lspec...@hampshire.edu wrote:
8) If you want to become a rock star eternal golden coder's hero then
develop an Emacs-like Clojure coding environment for which the features ARE
discoverable and for which the learning curve is gentle. This sort of
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:30 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Ben Wolfson wolf...@gmail.com wrote:
The macro (which IMO is terrible and shouldn't be emulated)
Why do you think the macro is terrible?
It's unnecessarily unhygienic:
On Friday, June 7, 2013 6:45:43 AM UTC-5, Mike Chaliy wrote:
Visual Studio and all around it is almost the only point why people use
CLR. If language does not have VS integration (or integration is basic)
there is no point to restrict yourself to CLR and this makes people to go
with JVM
Be that as it may: if you work in a MS-centric company, shifting to JVM
clojure is iffy at best. OTOH, convincing people who've never used anything
except C# that there are alternatives worth considering is quite an uphill
battle. At least one friend over the years has gotten fed up at my
Before, I used vim for several years. But when I learned Clojure I switched
to emacs, and it's really not hard or awkward like I was afraid of.
Honestly now I like it much better than vim. And I've found paredit and
nrepl.el to be extremely handy, even used together.
On Tuesday, January 17,
Thanks everyone for your answers. I must say I'm quite mystified as to why
Stuart's version works.
I ended up defining a function that has the same signature as the protocol,
and whose first argument wraps a function that contains the appropriate
code.
Vincent
On Wednesday, 5 June 2013
Newbie question here. This code:
(println (flatten(map first '([1 2] [3 4] [5]
(def mapfirst (partial map first))
(println
(- '([1 2] [3 4] [5])
mapfirst
flatten
))
(println
(- '([1 2] [3 4] [5])
(partial map first)
flatten
))
prints out:
(1 3 5)
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Matt Smith matt.smith...@gmail.com wrote:
(- '([1 2] [3 4] [5])
(partial map first)
flatten
)
Because this becomes
(flatten (partial '([1 2] [3 4] [5]) map first))
I think I understand how you thought; (partial map first) becomes a
function,
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Matt Smith matt.smith...@gmail.com wrote:
(println
(- '([1 2] [3 4] [5])
(partial map first)
flatten
))
when expanded becomes this:
(println
(flatten (partial '([1 2] [3 4] [5]) map first)))
It looks like what you really want is to
Got it. Thanks!
On Friday, June 7, 2013 3:29:55 PM UTC-6, Jonathan Fischer Friberg wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Matt Smith matt.s...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
(- '([1 2] [3 4] [5])
(partial map first)
flatten
)
Because this becomes
(flatten (partial '([1
What (+ x y) compiles down is highly dependent on the surrounding context,
including but not limited to the local type-hints and the value of
*unchecked-math*. Actually verifying that it's calling the primitive,
unboxed, easily inlined clojure.lang.Numbers.add(long, long) requires
either a
Because
(partial map first) return function
= (- [[1 2] [3 4] [5]] (partial map first))
#core$partial$fn__3796 clojure.core$partial$fn__3796@1cd14f7
you should call function to get result
= (- [[1 2] [3 4] [5]] ((partial map first)) flatten)
(1 3 5)
2013/6/8 Matt Smith matt.smith...@gmail.com
*Learning Emacs is more important than learning Clojure.*
-- A Clojure fanboy and former Vim user
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:46 PM, futile sbdegu...@gmail.com wrote:
Before, I used vim for several years. But when I learned Clojure I
switched to emacs, and it's really not hard or awkward
FWIW a third option to determine the exact method called is
jvm.tools.analyzer:
clojure.tools.analyzer= (clojure.pprint/pprint (ast (+ 1 2)))
{:op :static-method,
:env
{:source NO_SOURCE_FILE,
:column 29,
:line 1,
:locals {},
:ns {:name clojure.tools.analyzer}},
:class
On Jun 7, 2013, at 4:36 PM, Terje Norderhaug wrote:
MCLIDE is alive and well. Although the most recent public build was released
last summer, there are open source on github for those that want to
participate in the development:
https://github.com/TerjeNorderhaug/mclide
Thanks Terje
Try here
http://nakkaya.com/2010/03/16/adding-custom-libraries-into-local-leiningen-repository/
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 3:47:40 AM UTC-8, Dick Davies wrote:
I've got a couple of projects that need a newer version of a JAR
than is available in Maven.
Is there any support/syntax
Hi, I am trying to write a function to extract words from a file that are four
characters or more, and nine characters or less. Many words could appear on a
single line, so the implementation needs to combine the words from all the
lines. I wrote a function to do this, but I am getting an
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Steven D. Arnold
thoth.amon.i...@gmail.com wrote:
(defn filter-file
[]
(with-open [rdr (reader /Users/thoth/wordlist.txt)]
(flatten
(for
[line (line-seq rdr)]
(filter
(and #(= (count %) 9)
#(= (count %) 4))
38 matches
Mail list logo
