The Cambridge (UK) Clojure group used to meet monthly, but has recently
lost momentum. I'm trying to turn that around and get us back on track with
a regular monthly meet-up. If you are in the Cambridge area and might be
interested in attending these meet-ups, please take a few minutes to
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Brandon Bloom brandon.d.bl...@gmail.comwrote:
You've outlined 2 out of the 3 interesting (to me) shapes: 1) raw data
structures and 2) datoms. I think that the 3rd interesting one is a
map/vector tree, like the CLJS analyzer output.
By raw data structures,
Hi Joerg,
I am not sure I understand your question. The API class is for intraprocess
communication, not interprocess.
All API does is provide a public, supported entry point for the kinds of
things people are already doing with Var. The latter is undesirable because
using Var makes it way too
Hi,
In the first week I concentrated on the core datastructures of expresso.
How to construct an expression, a rule and specify a transformation ?
I wrote about it here
http://kimavcrp.blogspot.de/2013/06/gsoc-expressions-rules-and-first.html
please comment whether the user interface goes in
Can you please provide an example for such a usw cause?
Thanks
Las
On Jun 23, 2013 1:38 PM, Stuart Halloway stuart.hallo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Joerg,
I am not sure I understand your question. The API class is for
intraprocess communication, not interprocess.
All API does is provide a
On Jun 23, 2013 1:43 AM, kovas boguta kovas.bog...@gmail.com wrote:
what about the other cases? Random java objects and whatnot.
Those should be output in an EDN way, though its unclear what they would
mean when read. Would there be any attempt to convey their contents or
characteristics?
i found example that i can do
(defmethod x 5 [y] (do stuff))
but can i do
(defmethod #( % 10) [y] (do stuff)) somehow? like in a pattern match of
haskell/scala?
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
you need a dispatch functions that produces discrete dispatch values
using your example:
(defmulti x #(cond
( % 10) :less-than-10
;;... further conditions producing different dispatch
values
))
;; dispatch on the dispatch values
(defmethod x :less-then-10 [x]
Hi,
After I got your help last week to get my Macro working :) I tried to
expand it more:
I'm trying to parameterizing my object creation (I'm using
clojure.core.match). Source class offers multiple constructors:
(defmacro source [source-name constructor-args meths]
(match
i see
thx
2013/6/23 László Török ltoro...@gmail.com
you need a dispatch functions that produces discrete dispatch values
using your example:
(defmulti x #(cond
( % 10) :less-than-10
;;... further conditions producing different dispatch
values
))
;;
Due to unexpected expenses, I'm going to be unable to use my early bird
ticket to Lambda Jam (July 8-10 in Chicago). I can't get a refund, but I
can designate a substitute if anyone's interested. Please contact me off
list if so.
Thanks.
Mark
--
--
You received this message because you are
By raw data structures, you mean the concrete implementing classes, a
la clojure.lang.PersistentVector?
Yes.
(quote 1) -
{:head :list :body [quote 1]}
You're not going far enough with this. Here's how my code is representing
that:
{:composite :list, :items [{:value quote} {:value 1}]}
plugin version is 0.5.286
Am 23.06.2013 00:25, schrieb Colin Fleming:
Which version of the IntelliJ plugin are you using? You can see this by
opening the settings, selecting plugins then selecting the La Clojure
plugin. In recent versions the compiler has changed and I've had
occasional
This strikes me as pretty odd:
user (let [z 1
try 2
fn* 3]
(try (let [x (fn* ([a b c] [a b c]))]
(x z try fn*))
(catch Exception e e)))
[1 2 3]
--
Ben Wolfson
Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
Special forms are special when used in a list. IMO it's a bad idea to use
special forms
as local names, a caveat which is surprisingly under-documented.
Thanks,
Ambrose
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Ben Wolfson wolf...@gmail.com wrote:
This strikes me as pretty odd:
user (let [z 1
Well, when used as the first element of a list. (And I certainly wouldn't
use them as local names, since that would be extremely confusing; I was
trying to verify the correctness of some code I'm working on.)
But I called these extra-special because, in my understanding of the
term, special form
or even without let:
(condp re-find msg
#^:(.*?)!.*PRIVMSG (.*) :(.*) : (fn [[_ from to message]] (true-form
...)) (false-form...))
On Saturday, June 22, 2013 11:26:35 PM UTC+12, Vincent wrote:
What about using condp?
(condp re-find msg
#^:(.*?)!.*PRIVMSG (.*) :(.*) : #(let [[_ from to
17 matches
Mail list logo