On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 at 5:50:13 PM UTC-6, Matching Socks wrote:
>
> For those keeping score at home, the CLJ-2436 patch says,
>
> (defn- typeref->class
> - [typeref classloader]
> + ^Class [typeref classloader]
>(if (class? typeref)
> typeref
> -
For those keeping score at home, the CLJ-2436 patch says,
(defn- typeref->class
- [typeref classloader]
+ ^Class [typeref classloader]
(if (class? typeref)
typeref
- (clojure.lang.RT/classForName (typename typeref) false classloader)))
+(clojure.lang.RT/classForName (typename
Thanks for the pointer! My mistake was looking for this in the source-- had
I ack'd over the doc/ directory I would have found it!
Randy
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:49 PM Justin Smith wrote:
> I'll add that I knew this, but it took me longer than I expected to
> actually find the documentation
I'll add that I knew this, but it took me longer than I expected to
actually find the documentation to point to. I don't know how a new user of
the library would be expected to discover what that symbol means.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:43 PM Justin Smith wrote:
> :> is a valid Clojure keyword,
:> is a valid Clojure keyword, but has no special meaning on its own.
In Reagent's version of the Hiccup DSL, :> introduces a Reagent component
defined from a React component
I've been trying to read through and understand the examples in the reagent
repo, and I've come across something that I just don't quite get:
:>
I've looked over all the docs for Clojure, Clojurescript and Hiccup, but
find no reference to this. It appears as the first element in vectors in a
Given how small the delta is from Beta 6 to Beta 7, it should surprise no one
that all our tests pass on Beta 7 at World Singles Networks
Sean Corfield -- (970) FOR-SEAN -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
That is new code in reflect.java so that's a good catch. Patched
in https://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-2436 and will prob get that in
next.
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 10:35:46 PM UTC-6, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
>
> Not testing results this time, but just a comparison of reflection
>
