"Unable to resolve
symbol". Yes, it is possible to overcome by using "declare" call on
the top, but this requires manual work. Is there something more
automated which I am not aware of?
Wbr,
Jevgeni Holodkov
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go
I would suggest Estonia, but Germany is good as well! :)
Br,
Jevgeni
On Jan 23, 3:45 pm, "Heinz N. Gies" wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2010, at 12:04 , Boštjan Jerko wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 23.1.2010, at 10:33, Edmund wrote:
>
> >> East coast for we Europeans ?
>
> >> On Jan 23, 8:53 am, Christophe Gr
placing the 1.1 with 1.1M or 11/10 before evaluating
the code?
Wbr,
Jevgeni
On Jan 17, 7:47 pm, B Smith-Mannschott wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 23:13, Jevgeni Holodkov
>
> wrote:
> > Currently, if the result of the multiplication is too small, then the
> > type will be
Currently, if the result of the multiplication is too small, then the
type will be double, despite the fact that one of the parameter was
BigDecimal:
Clojure 1.1.0
user=> (* 100M 1.1)
110.01
user=> (class (* 100M 1.1))
java.lang.Double
Such thing are really hard to find and this can b