In Java, you're supposed to use Boolean.valueOf whenever converting a string
to a Boolean. The constructors are useless unless you for some reason need
separate identities for Boolean objects.
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Janico Greifenberg j...@jgre.org wrote:
Hi,
I encountered
That sounds interesting; you might take a look at Joda
Timehttp://joda-time.sourceforge.net/.
Although I've never used it myself, from what I've heard it's the Java
library that people actually use for dates/times (I do know that Google uses
it). Doing a quick search, it looks like Mark
You need to do (into [] '(1 2 3)) otherwise it will be read as calling the
function 1 with arguments 2 and 3.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 3:56 PM, wubbie sunj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Why into does not work for second argument of list?
user= (into [] (1 2 3))
java.lang.ClassCastException:
seq returns nil when a collection has no items. According to the
documentation for empty?, empty? is the same as (not (seq coll)) so you
should use seq for expressing the opposite of empty?
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:12 AM, GS gsincl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 13, 2:59 pm, Chouser
it. Consider this feedback and
opinion. You are getting a data point on how one person thinks (or fails to
think).
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Nick Vogel voge...@gmail.com wrote:
It is, that article is part of the wiki linked to directly from
clojure.org.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11
Ok, first of all, here's how I translated that python code:
(defn msort [myList]
(if ( (count myList) 1)
(let [l1 (first myList) l2 (second myList)]
(recur (concat (drop 2 myList) (my-merge l1 l2
(first myList)))
The main thing that might need explaining is the recur, which
By the way just to clarify, the use of recur is iterative, it's just
written in clojure in its recursive form.
On Jan 11, 1:32 am, Nick Vogel voge...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, first of all, here's how I translated that python code:
(defn msort [myList]
(if ( (count myList) 1)
(let [l1
I guess I'm having trouble understanding what you're getting it, the
way I'm interpreting it is that you want to have seqs represented
differently from lists when outputted at the REPL. Also, I'm not sure
if this is a point of confusion, but lazy sequences are different from
sequence.
