and an = will make
bob your uncle.
If you haven't seen them writing a recursive function would be a solution too.
I'm not sure what the "hint" is about. It seems very misleading to me.
Good luck!
Cheers,
Tristan
On 7 October 2015 at 19:06, Moe Aboulkheir <m...@nervous.io>
I am pleased to announce the release of clj-amp 0.9.0[1][2], a Clojure
implementation of the AMP[3] protocol (the reference implementation of
which is found in the Twisted networking framework for Python).
clj-amp is implemented on top of Aleph/Manifold/Gloss; Special thanks
to Zach Tellman for
what the hell
is going on (just like i did!).
cheers
.Tristan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first
Thanks for the notes Meikel, i'm a clojure newbie so this sort of
advice in invaluable to me!
On 8 Jan., 16:00, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
Hi,
On Jan 8, 3:10 pm, tristan tristan.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been working on a problem where I want the user to be able to
input
Thanks Chouser! I had not thought of moving the (list 'fn ...etc) bit
into the eval statement, it works perfectly! here is the final result!
http://github.com/tristan/modelmaker/blob/d7dbdfa9b998cfc6b846ea5c235b4496ed8caa63/infix_parser.clj
.Tristan
On 8 Jan., 16:15, Chouser chou...@gmail.com
-of-items)
But note that those days, memfn is somewhat deprecated in favor of raw (fn
...) or #(...) constructs.
HTH,
--
Laurent
2009/12/15 tristan tristan.k...@gmail.com
Hi guys,
I have a list (which i don't know the size of) and i want to do
something like this:
(doto
if there is a way i could get the macro
i wanted going.
please help! my googling and trauling through Stuart Halloway's book
have come up naught.
thanks in advance!
-Tristan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send
://github.com/tristan/project-euler-code/blob/4a17bc271b4b2743ee1d5b5692f86f963c6bcc7b/0087.py
runs in ~4 seconds (timed using cygwin time python 0087.py whereas
my clojure version
http://github.com/tristan/project-euler-code/blob/4a17bc271b4b2743ee1d5b5692f86f963c6bcc7b/0087.clj
takes over 20
Thanks for the explanation Christophe.
I really need to try use (for) more often. I seem to forget about it
all the time.
On Dec 27, 10:42 pm, Christophe Grand christo...@cgrand.net wrote:
tristan a écrit :
Hi All,
I've been trying to learn clojure lately by solving the project euler