Bozhidar Batsov bozhidar.bat...@gmail.com writes:
Yeah, they should definitely remove nrepl.el support from
ob-clojure.el.
Done in the master branch of org-mode, thanks.
--
Bastien
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this
Hi Sanel and thanks for Monroe.
I think the use case is clear: lightweight alternative to Cider.
So the question is what is the use case pertaining to nrepl.el, which is
also lightweight.
On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 7:50:52 PM UTC+3, Sanel Zukan wrote:
Hi everyone,
Here
On October 3, 2014 at 3:06:08 PM, Daniel Szmulewicz
(daniel.szmulew...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi Sanel and thanks for Monroe.
I think the use case is clear: lightweight alternative to Cider.
So the question is what is the use case pertaining to nrepl.el, which is also
lightweight.
This question is
You're right.
I got confused because in ob-clojure.el, both cider and nrepl.el are
considered back-ends, so I thought they were separate things. So in fact,
nrepl.el is just an old incarnation of Cider? Ob-clojure.el needs a fixing,
I believe.
Oops, I meant
nrepl.el:
The transition to cider was tough for some, I remember it being broken for me
for a version or two. Perhaps they added that for the transition?
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Daniel Szmulewicz
daniel.szmulew...@gmail.com wrote:
You're right.
I got confused because in ob-clojure.el, both
Yeah, they should definitely remove nrepl.el support from ob-clojure.el.
—
Cheers,
Bozhidar
On October 3, 2014 at 15:40:31, Daniel Szmulewicz (daniel.szmulew...@gmail.com)
wrote:
You're right.
I got confused because in ob-clojure.el, both cider and nrepl.el are considered
back-ends, so I
Thanks!
Just installed it and disabled CIDER. Hmm first things I miss are no syntax
highlighting and no paredit.
I think I can just add a hook for paredit, but not sure about syntax
highlighting. Any ideas?
On Thursday, September 25, 2014 8:32:05 PM UTC+8, Sanel Zukan wrote:
Thanks for reply
Btw, you’re using CIDER’s old bencode parser, which was flawed (big requests
break it due to deep recursive calls). We recently reworked it and the new
version is much more robust.
—
Cheers,
Bozhidar
On September 25, 2014 at 4:32:12 PM, Sanel Zukan (san...@gmail.com) wrote:
Thanks for reply
True; Monroe for now is focused only on providing stable nrepl connection
with usable REPL, but you should be able to use any *clojure-mode.el* that
floats around the net. AFAIK, Cider comes with *clojure-mode.el* and you
could try it. If you find issues please let me know.
Also, there is
Thanks for the tip!
Actually, I was using the one from *nrepl.el*, but I will check your fixed
version and see how to adapt it :) Do you a sample that will break the
current parser (so I can use it for validation and testing)?
Best,
Sanel
On Friday, September 26, 2014 9:34:11 PM UTC+2,
Thanks for reply with the details, Bastien :)
As someone new to CIDER (probably only use 10% of its features), what's
the difference between this and CIDER?
I think you already answered it :) I find Cider amazing project, but is a
bit biggish for my taste, especially if you would like to get
Hi everyone,
Here https://github.com/sanel/monroe is initial release for Monroe, a new
Clojure nREPL client for Emacs. The main idea behind Monroe is to be
simple, easy to install (just put it in your *load-path*) and to work like
inferior modes (inferior-lisp or inferior-scheme), providing
Looks great.But it doesn't support code completion?
2014-09-25 0:50 GMT+08:00 Sanel Zukan san...@gmail.com:
Hi everyone,
Here https://github.com/sanel/monroe is initial release for Monroe, a
new Clojure nREPL client for Emacs. The main idea behind Monroe is to be
simple, easy to install
Correct, there is no support for code completion. This way you can use
whatever facility you prefer, like autocomplete or company-mode as this is
strictly client-side operation.
Best,
Sanel
On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 7:04:54 PM UTC+2, dennis wrote:
Looks great.But it doesn't support
Looks neat. As someone new to CIDER (probably only use 10% of its
features), what's the difference between this and CIDER? i.e. why would I
want to use this over CIDER? (could be good to put in the README as well)
On Thursday, September 25, 2014 12:50:52 AM UTC+8, Sanel Zukan wrote:
Hi
John Louis Del Rosario joh...@gmail.com writes:
Looks neat. As someone new to CIDER (probably only use 10% of its
features), what's the difference between this and CIDER? i.e. why
would I want to use this over CIDER? (could be good to put in the
README as well)
Copying what's on the reddit
16 matches
Mail list logo
