Re: A controversial call to bump libraries from 0.x to 1.0

2020-03-14 Thread Sean Corfield
I don't think the doc generator runs automatically at the moment -- and, for a while, it was having problems processing several Contrib repos (java.jdbc still shows 0.7.10-SNAPSHOT in the generated docs, but 0.7.11 was released a while back). On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 10:21 AM Matching Socks

Re: A controversial call to bump libraries from 0.x to 1.0

2020-03-14 Thread Matching Socks
(A constructive note) The core.async official API docs are still labeled "core.async 0.7.560-SNAPSHOT (in development)". I followed the link from https://github.com/clojure/core.async . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to

Re: A controversial call to bump libraries from 0.x to 1.0

2020-02-19 Thread Alex Miller
I think you are misinterpreting what people believe the 0.x to 1.x means. In the wide world of semver, 0.x indicates "unstable" and 1.x indicates "first stable"- you're conflating that special case with a general n.x to n+1.x which is interpreted as "breaking change". (See https://semver.org/

Re: A controversial call to bump libraries from 0.x to 1.0

2020-02-18 Thread Sean Corfield
That ship done sailed already today... many Contrib libs hit 1.0.0 (or 1.0.x) and most of the rest will follow suit in the next several days I expect! I certainly plan to bump tools.cli and, with Fogus' help, core.cache and core.memoize to 1.0.0. java.jdbc will likely remain at 0.7.11 since its

A controversial call to bump libraries from 0.x to 1.0

2020-02-18 Thread Matching Socks
Dear August Forum: Today I noticed a new post on "Inside Clojure" https://insideclojure.org/2020/02/18/lib-version/ , which says, after some thoughtful justification, "we have lots of libraries in the Clojure ecosystem that have been around for many years, are widely used, have stable APIs,