On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Jules wrote:
> It is impossible (undecidable) to tell precisely which functions a
> function will call. Therefore you will need to consider not exactly
> set of functions that a function will call, but some superset of that.
> Why not take as your superset all fun
It is impossible (undecidable) to tell precisely which functions a
function will call. Therefore you will need to consider not exactly
set of functions that a function will call, but some superset of that.
Why not take as your superset all functions? That is, always compile
all functions.
On Aug 9
As far as I know, the book "Lisp In Small Pieces" should be a tremendous
help for anyone who builds a Lisp interpreter or compiler. You might want to
check it out.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 2:21 PM, CuppoJava wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Jarkko. That helps quite a lot. I have some hacks
> in place
Thanks for the reply Jarkko. That helps quite a lot. I have some hacks
in place that works most of the time, but was stuck trying to figure
out a general solution. Knowing that there isn't one puts my mind at
ease.
-Patrick
On Aug 9, 1:56 pm, Jarkko Oranen wrote:
> On Aug 9, 7:54 pm, CuppoJava
On Aug 9, 7:54 pm, CuppoJava wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> Just for educational purposes, I'm writing a simple lisp compiler and
> am stuck on a small problem.
>
> I'm trying to write a function called (compile-function), which will
> take a function as input and compile it.
>
> If that function ca
Hello everyone,
Just for educational purposes, I'm writing a simple lisp compiler and
am stuck on a small problem.
I'm trying to write a function called (compile-function), which will
take a function as input and compile it.
If that function calls other functions, I would like (compile-
function)
