Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Konrad
Hinsenkonrad.hin...@laposte.net wrote:
What is particularly nice about Clojure is that in most situations
you don't need to switch to Java for speed. You can optimize your
code by adding type hints and
On Jun 30, 2009, at 19:07, Mark Engelberg wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Konrad
Hinsenkonrad.hin...@laposte.net wrote:
What is particularly nice about Clojure is that in most situations
you don't need to switch to Java for speed. You can optimize your
code by adding type hints and
On Jun 30, 2:41 am, fft1976 fft1...@gmail.com wrote:
I would be curious to know if anyone is using Clojure for CPU-
intensive work where performance really counts.
I'm using clojure for various computational physics tasks:
1. I'm writing a dsl for substructure searching.
2. I'm doing classical
On 29.06.2009, at 20:41, fft1976 wrote:
It's been argued by some that Clojure is as fast as Java, because at
worst, you can implement your bottlenecks in Java. I have a problem
with this argument, because the data structures that your Java has to
work with are still (wasteful) Clojure ones.
On Jun 29, 2009, at 12:41 PM, fft1976 wrote:
Based on the recent survey What are people using Clojure for?,
people are mostly using it for non-CPU-intensive work, like parsing,
report generation, GUIs, glue code.
It's been argued by some that Clojure is as fast as Java, because at
worst,
On Jun 30, 12:55 am, Daniel Lyons fus...@storytotell.org wrote:
I don't see why that wouldn't be the case, if you were using Java's
native multidimensional arrays. I don't think it would be as much fun,
That's my point. It's often argued that you can just optimize the
teeny bottleneck by
On Jun 30, 2009, at 3:53 AM, fft1976 wrote:
On Jun 30, 12:55 am, Daniel Lyons fus...@storytotell.org wrote:
I don't see why that wouldn't be the case, if you were using Java's
native multidimensional arrays. I don't think it would be as much
fun,
That's my point. It's often argued
Based on the recent survey What are people using Clojure for?,
people are mostly using it for non-CPU-intensive work, like parsing,
report generation, GUIs, glue code.
It's been argued by some that Clojure is as fast as Java, because at
worst, you can implement your bottlenecks in Java. I have a
I would be curious to know if anyone is using Clojure for CPU-
intensive work where performance really counts.
Respectfully, I wouldn't class telephony as non-CPU-intensive. :)
Speed directly translates to calls-per-second. I've been very happy
with Clojure thus far.
On Jun 29, 1:39 pm, Richard Newman holyg...@gmail.com wrote:
I would be curious to know if anyone is using Clojure for CPU-
intensive work where performance really counts.
Respectfully, I wouldn't class telephony as non-CPU-intensive. :)
I would have thought those kinds of things are
Respectfully, I wouldn't class telephony as non-CPU-intensive. :)
I would have thought those kinds of things are bandwidth-limited.
Typically not.
Some rough numbers: a complete call setup and teardown is usually no
more than 5KB, spread over the course of the call -- the initial
11 matches
Mail list logo
