I'm sure that some level of moderation is necessary to keep the list clean,
but does it have to be so draconian?
Hmm, I didn't even know the list was moderated (beyond first post
moderation which I'd assume was the norm on Google Groups). Perhaps
Clojure/core can comment on what the actual
The policy is entirely controlled by Google Groups. I think it's
time-based.
-S
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be
The policy is entirely controlled by Google Groups. I think it's time-based.
-S
It can also be overridden per user, once you find your way through the
confusing groups API.
Evan, you should be unmoderated now.
Stu
Stuart Halloway
Clojure/core
http://clojure.com
--
You received this
And maybe in the wrong thread ? :)))
Whoops, submitted that a bit too soon.
I guess only couple of things to add:
(1) The cost of obtaining the primitive array and returning it to the
cache is likely no worse than operations on an ArrayList, so those
should be very cheap.
(2) The
Thanks a bunch!
-Evan
On Friday, March 23, 2012 6:22:12 AM UTC-7, stuart@gmail.com wrote:
The policy is entirely controlled by Google Groups. I think it's
time-based.
-S
It can also be overridden per user, once you find your way through the
confusing groups API.
Evan, you should
Hi,
I've been posting very lightly to this group for a few weeks now, and am an
active member of the Clojure community (or so I'd like to think), and yet
all my posts still have to go through human moderation. I understand that
there's probably something algorithmic going on behind the scenes
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Evan Mezeske emeze...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure that some level of moderation is necessary to keep the list clean,
but does it have to be so draconian?
Hmm, I didn't even know the list was moderated (beyond first post
moderation which I'd assume was the norm on
