CL
On Dec 9, 7:09 pm, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Alec Battles alec.batt...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure a few people have read this news already. It's been up for a
week, though strangely ZDnet -- which, on principle, I refuse to link
to
Why?
--
What is FFI?
On Dec 9, 10:47 pm, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:43 AM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
It does beg the question, though: what is a reasonable bare minimum
function set that a real-life lisp would require?
I think different people might
Foreign function interface. To call
C/C++ libs.
On Dec 10, 2010, at 6:52 PM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
What is FFI?
On Dec 9, 10:47 pm, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:43 AM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
It does beg the question, though: what
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Alec Battles alec.batt...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure a few people have read this news already. It's been up for a
week, though strangely ZDnet -- which, on principle, I refuse to link
to
Why?
Because of the website's close ties to Washington.
This blog post
I'm sure a few people have read this news already. It's been up for a
week, though strangely ZDnet -- which, on principle, I refuse to link
to -- is one of the only places to write it up.
http://pr-usa.net/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=560484Itemid=
Nice news to read before
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Alec Battles alec.batt...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure a few people have read this news already. It's been up for a
week, though strangely ZDnet -- which, on principle, I refuse to link
to
Why?
-- is one of the only places to write it up.
Common Lisp.
http://quotenil.com/
On Dec 9, 7:09 pm, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Alec Battles alec.batt...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure a few people have read this news already. It's been up for a
week, though strangely ZDnet -- which, on principle, I
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:55 PM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
Common Lisp.
It figures. :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are
On Dec 9, 9:07 pm, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:55 PM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
Common Lisp.
It figures. :)
It's still a really exciting story - thanks Alec for sharing it! I was
reading Gabor's post (http://quotenil.com/Planet-Wars-Post-
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:13 AM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 9, 9:07 pm, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:55 PM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
Common Lisp.
It figures. :)
It's still a really exciting story - thanks Alec for sharing it! I
On Dec 9, 9:16 pm, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:13 AM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 9, 9:07 pm, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:55 PM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
Common Lisp.
It figures. :)
It's
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:43 AM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
It does beg the question, though: what is a reasonable bare minimum
function set that a real-life lisp would require?
I think different people might give different answers to that.
The academic computer scientist is likely to
12 matches
Mail list logo
