On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 12:27 -0700, Tim Dysinger wrote:
I'm using org-mode, org-babel swank for a living document I'm
writing. I'm generating a PDF which includes documentation, working
clojure code that generates incanter graphs. Also the generated
incanter graphs are included in the
Hey Tim,
Just wanted to say thanks for this post and this is a great discussion. I
have the privilege of being able to spend a small amount of my time working
on official unofficial projects at my work. I had seen an earlier post by
you where I think you may have posted the same code to
Nurullah did an excellent post on org-mode, Clojure and inferior-lisp from
Emacs a while back:
http://nakkaya.com/2010/12/12/using-clojure-with-org-babel-and-inferior-lisp/
On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 8:27:23 PM UTC+1, Tim Dysinger wrote:
I'm using org-mode, org-babel swank for a living
I'm using org-mode, org-babel swank for a living document I'm writing.
I'm generating a PDF which includes documentation, working clojure code
that generates incanter graphs. Also the generated incanter graphs are
included in the generated (latex) PDF.
On Monday, January 23, 2012 3:14:09 AM
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 06:51 -0800, Folcon wrote:
Hi Tim,
Personally if you have done or would be interested in doing a quick
vid cast of how you progress through your workflow, I think that would
be very interesting.
Sorry for the delay. Here is the answer to your request.
Note that the
On 30 Jan 2012, at 17:07, daly wrote:
The key result was that I discovered what I call my personal
irreducible error rate. If I do 100 things I will make 3 errors.
This was independent of the task. So typing 100 characters has
3 wrong letters which were mostly caught while typing. Writing
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 10:43 +, Sam Aaron wrote:
On 30 Jan 2012, at 17:07, daly wrote:
The key result was that I discovered what I call my personal
irreducible error rate. If I do 100 things I will make 3 errors.
This was independent of the task. So typing 100 characters has
3 wrong
Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com writes:
Has anybody got any real world usage reports regarding using literate
programming in emacs? In particular, does paredit and slime work inside
the clojure fragments when using org.babel for example?
For the update in Pallet docs [1], we've been
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Hugo Duncan duncan.h...@gmail.com wrote:
SLIME works fully within the code blocks. For example C-x C-e can be
used to evaluate expressions. Paredit also works.
My understanding is that unless you use C-c C-k to evaluate the entire
file (which I don't think works
Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Hugo Duncan duncan.h...@gmail.com wrote:
SLIME works fully within the code blocks. For example C-x C-e can be
used to evaluate expressions. Paredit also works.
My understanding is that unless you use C-c C-k to
I would love to see your .emacs setup around these tools.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first
Fogus mefo...@gmail.com writes:
I would love to see your .emacs setup around these tools.
I'll put together a blog post - my .emacs files could do with a cleanup,
so this sounds like a good excuse to get it done.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 10:04 -0500, daly wrote:
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 06:51 -0800, Folcon wrote:
Hi Tim,
Personally if you have done or would be interested in doing a quick
vid cast of how you progress through your workflow, I think that would
be very interesting.
Sort of extreme
Here's a paper that might be interesting to folk discussing in this
thread: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v46/i03/paper
Cheers
U
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts
Hi Tim,
Personally if you have done or would be interested in doing a quick vid
cast of how you progress through your workflow, I think that would be very
interesting.
Regards,
Folcon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 06:51 -0800, Folcon wrote:
Hi Tim,
Personally if you have done or would be interested in doing a quick
vid cast of how you progress through your workflow, I think that would
be very interesting.
Sort of extreme pair programming with everybody? :-)
There is no such
I know I would find it incredibly helpful, and would consider paying a
token sum of money (£5?)...
On 28 January 2012 15:04, daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 06:51 -0800, Folcon wrote:
Hi Tim,
Personally if you have done or would be interested in doing a quick
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 15:27 +, Colin Yates wrote:
I know I would find it incredibly helpful, and would consider paying a
token sum of money (£5?)...
An amusing thought but no thanks.
Buy yourself a pint and swear you'll at least try to write
your next program in some form of literate
Fair enough :) - deal. Assuming I ever get to leave my pit of despair
(trying to get a well-known javascript charting library to render
properly...how hard can these things be!).
On 28 January 2012 15:41, daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 15:27 +, Colin Yates
I think I could live with that :)...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe
The topic is literate programming in emacs, not eclipse ;).
The trivial amount of Clojure I have done so far has all been in emacs and
letting go of paredit, slime, and emacs in general is already pretty hard!
On 24 January 2012 03:06, daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
For Eclipse I
With a little hacking, org-babel works with Clojure editing evaluation in
SLIME. I've been using it to write Clojure training materials.
You need the latest versions of org-mode, SLIME, and clojure-mode. My
.emacs has the relevant elisp snippets.
http://github.com/stuartsierra/dotfiles
-S
Thanks Stuart.
On 24 January 2012 14:18, Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com wrote:
With a little hacking, org-babel works with Clojure editing evaluation
in SLIME. I've been using it to write Clojure training materials.
You need the latest versions of org-mode, SLIME, and
Hi all,
There are some excellent resources on this mailing list regarding literate
resources, but they are more based around the theory rather than actual use.
Has anybody got any real world usage reports regarding using literate
programming in emacs? In particular, does paredit and slime
I've been wondering this as well -- I'm specifically curious about how one
might jump back and forth between literate source like
thishttps://raw.github.com/nakkaya/nakkaya.com/master/resources/posts/2011-12-15-fractals-in-clojure-distributed-buddhabrot-fractal-using-clojurescript.org
and
the
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 05:14 -0800, Colin Yates wrote:
Hi all,
There are some excellent resources on this mailing list regarding
literate resources, but they are more based around the theory rather
than actual use.
Has anybody got any real world usage reports regarding using
literate
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 07:18 -0800, Sam Ritchie wrote:
I've been wondering this as well -- I'm specifically curious about how
one might jump back and forth between literate source like this and
the REPL. I know you can evaluate code snippets into the repl; I'm
thinking of early steps like
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anybody got any real world usage reports regarding using literate
programming in emacs? In particular, does paredit and slime work inside the
clojure fragments when using org.babel for example?
I had major problems
Excellent - very nice!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:19 AM, daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
It accepts either noweb syntax for chunks, as in:
chunkname=
(this is lisp code)
@
A rather unfortunate choice of delimiter if you wanted to use this
with Clojure code, since Clojure code frequently has internal
I've only briefly scanned what I think is the relevant code in tangle.lisp
posted by Tim Daly, but it appears that the @ must be the first character
on a line, which with indenting I've never seen in a Clojure source file.
It would be a tiny change to make the @ required to be on a line by itself,
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 16:17 -0500, Cedric Greevey wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:19 AM, daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
It accepts either noweb syntax for chunks, as in:
chunkname=
(this is lisp code)
@
A rather unfortunate choice of delimiter if you wanted to use
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 6:23 PM, daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 16:17 -0500, Cedric Greevey wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:19 AM, daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
It accepts either noweb syntax for chunks, as in:
chunkname=
(this is lisp code)
For Eclipse I suppose we could invent a chunk syntax
and create a plugin. If people are interested perhaps we
could create a Literate Clojure plugin for Eclipse. See
http://www.eclipse.org/articles/Article-Your%20First%
20Plug-in/YourFirstPlugin.html
That would make Clojure and
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:06 PM, daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
For Eclipse I suppose we could invent a chunk syntax
and create a plugin. If people are interested perhaps we
could create a Literate Clojure plugin for Eclipse. See
35 matches
Mail list logo
