Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2011-01-28 Thread Aaron Cohen
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Alex Miller alexdmil...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi all, I'm doing a bit of doc cleanup on http://clojure.org and I'd welcome your feedback on things that are broken or could be improved.  I'm not looking (or likely authorized :) to make any drastic changes but if

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-12-29 Thread Shantanu Kumar
Kind of late, but I hope you can still consider this. The latest news section on the homepage should be marked with corresponding date against each news entry: http://clojure.org/ Regards, Shantanu On Nov 28, 10:08 am, Tom Faulhaber tomfaulha...@gmail.com wrote: Jason, ActuallyAlexwas a

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-11-27 Thread Tom Faulhaber
Jason, Actually Alex was a little off the mark here. The problem was in the templates that generate the autodoc so they were pretty easy to fix for all versions. The github links are now fixed and I expect to modify the assembla pointers to the new confluence/jira stuff tonight or tomorrow.

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-11-17 Thread Allen Johnson
I think annotations support was added in 1.2. Could we add some information to the Java Interop section regarding this? https://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/d2128e1505c0c117?pli=1 Allen On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Alex Miller alexdmil...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi all,

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-11-15 Thread Rick Moynihan
Hi Alex, I have one more Clojure Group for you: The Manchester (UK) Clojure Dojo http://manchester.clojuredojo.com/ I'm currently in the process of organising our next meeting, but a link on the clojure.org website would be appreciated. R. On 31 October 2010 02:38, Alex Miller

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-11-15 Thread Alex Miller
Done. On Nov 15, 12:21 pm, Rick Moynihan rick.moyni...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Alex, I have one more Clojure Group for you: The Manchester (UK) Clojure Dojo http://manchester.clojuredojo.com/ I'm currently in the process of organising our next meeting, but a link on the clojure.org website

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-11-15 Thread Tim Robinson
The main page link to API is a little confusing/annoying. I expect it to go here: http://clojure.org/api ( I expect this because doing a google search on clojure api brings it up) However the main page link to API goes directly to here: http://clojure.github.com/clojure/ It's kind of

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-11-11 Thread Rasmus Svensson
I also noticed that clojure.org/agents does not mention the *agent* var... // raek -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-11-05 Thread Rasmus Svensson
I think there should be a link from the Namespaces page to the Libs page. Hopefully, this will make it easier for people to find examples on how to use the ns form. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-11-03 Thread Alex Miller
Michael: thanks for those tips. I can't do anything about those but I will raise it... ka: you can find that kind of stuff now on the Clojure confluence pages: http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Home On Nov 2, 10:43 pm, ka sancha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Alex,  Can we have a section: Clojure

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-11-02 Thread Rick Mouritzen
Los Angeles Clojure Users Group http://clj-la.org/ On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Alex Miller alexdmil...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi all, I'm doing a bit of doc cleanup on http://clojure.org and I'd welcome your feedback on things that are broken or could be improved. I'm not looking (or likely

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-11-02 Thread Kyle R. Burton
I'm particularly interested in: - new user groups or suggestions for the community page - stuff that is just wrong or out of date Philly Clojure Language Club: http://groups.google.com/group/phl-clojure-language-club Kyle -- Twitter: @kyleburton Blog: http://asymmetrical-view.com/ Fun:

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-11-02 Thread Jason Wolfe
Not sure if you count this as off limits as part of the API page, but its first line points to a stale official source code for clojure -- should be updated to the new github repo. -Jason On Oct 30, 7:38 pm, Alex Miller alexdmil...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi all, I'm doing a bit of doc cleanup

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-11-02 Thread Alex Miller
- Jeff, Rick, Kyle - I've added your groups - added other groups mentioned on #clojure and twitter - cheat sheet has been updated to 1.2 - new tips on starting a user group page added - http://clojure.org/start_group (linked from the community page) - fixed broken links on contributing page -

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-11-02 Thread Michael Wood
This is perhaps a little off topic, but related. I see that http://code.google.com/p/clojure/ has been updated recently, but still references Assembla. These could do with an update too: http://sourceforge.net/projects/clojure/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/clojure-contrib/ -- Michael Wood

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-11-02 Thread Alex Miller
Jason - that's a good catch but out of my purview. Also, those are autodocs generated from the (released and thus immutable :) 1.2 afaik. On Nov 2, 4:12 pm, Jason Wolfe jawo...@berkeley.edu wrote: Not sure if you count this as off limits as part of the API page, but its first line points to a

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-11-02 Thread ka
Hi Alex, Can we have a section: Clojure - What's next? Dishes out some details links for the next versions and ideas. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-11-01 Thread Jeff Heon
I'm particularly interested in: - new user groups or suggestions for the community page Montreal Clojure group: http://www.bonjure.org/ Thank you kindly -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-10-31 Thread Phil Hagelberg
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Alex Miller alexdmil...@yahoo.com wrote: I'm doing a bit of doc cleanup on http://clojure.org and I'd welcome your feedback on things that are broken or could be improved.  I'm not looking (or likely authorized :) to make any drastic changes but if there are

Re: REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-10-31 Thread Sean Corfield
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Alex Miller alexdmil...@yahoo.com wrote: Some recent changes I've already made: - switched all of the old richhickey github references to clojure Yay! I'm particularly interested in: - new user groups or suggestions for the community page I'm curious - is

REQUEST for feedback on http://clojure.org

2010-10-30 Thread Alex Miller
Hi all, I'm doing a bit of doc cleanup on http://clojure.org and I'd welcome your feedback on things that are broken or could be improved. I'm not looking (or likely authorized :) to make any drastic changes but if there are things that you have run into, please drop a line here or in email to