:
Is there a rule of thumb or set of use cases when metadata is a more
elegant solution than simply adding more entries to a map or record?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note
:
Is there a rule of thumb or set of use cases when metadata is a more
elegant solution than simply adding more entries to a map or record?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts
McKitrick
wrote:
Is there a rule of thumb or set of use cases when metadata is a more
elegant solution than simply adding more entries to a map or record?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure
16:10:34 UTC+1 Jonathon McKitrick napísal(-a):
Is there a rule of thumb or set of use cases when metadata is a more
elegant solution than simply adding more entries to a map or record?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post
Is there a rule of thumb or set of use cases when metadata is a more
elegant solution than simply adding more entries to a map or record?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Yes- when the data you want to add shouldn't affect the value of the map.
---
Joe R. Smith
@solussd
On Jan 29, 2015, at 9:10 AM, Jonathon McKitrick jmckitr...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a rule of thumb or set of use cases when metadata is a more elegant
solution than simply adding more
