:
As a friendly suggestion, I'd like to offer that perhaps the derision is
caused not by the fact that you had the initiative to implement it
yourself, but rather by such phrasing as:
I'm shocked that [reduce/accum/foldr] is missing from clojure.core.
[...] This is one of the most basic
On Jun 17, 10:24 am, Wrexsoul d2387...@bsnow.net wrote:
On Jun 17, 12:44 am, Daniel Lyons fus...@storytotell.org wrote:
(use 'clojure.contrib.seq-utils)
Don't have that library. Still hasn't been released yet, last I
checked.
I am not sure if a pre-built clojure-contrib.jar is
the WrexTroll
Personal attacks are unwelcome here.
Indeed! It's called reduce:
http://clojure.org/api#toc476
I'm shocked you haven't noticed it in the API documentation.
I SPECIFICALLY did a search of the entire api docs to see if there was
anything like accum already in there. I
There's prebuilt SNAPSHOT releases available in Howard's Tapestry repository
- been using them happily from my maven based clojure app for awhile.
Thou an official 1.0 stamped release in maven central (along with
clojure-lang) would be most welcome.
--
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Parth
I only knew about map, apply, and reduce from studying haskell in uni.
I've not heard of 'reduce' referred to as 'accum', but then again when
I wanted to determine the number of elements in a seq, I kept
searching for 'length' and 'size' but didn't think of 'count', so it
can be a bit tricky eh
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:41 AM, CuppoJava patrickli_2...@hotmail.comwrote:
Finding the right function in the doc admittedly takes a little
practice. I've learned gradually, that Clojure pretty much has all its
bases covered though. You just need to find the function. And this
forum is
Finding the right function in the doc admittedly takes a little
practice.
I often end up reading through /api to find what I want, but Clojure
Categorized might be a much faster way to do it:
http://java.ociweb.com/mark/clojure/ClojureCategorized.html
I don't know if it's kept up-to-date
On Jun 17, 3:10 am, Mark Derricutt m...@talios.com wrote:
There's prebuilt SNAPSHOT releases available in Howard's Tapestry repository
- been using them happily from my maven based clojure app for awhile.
Thou an official 1.0 stamped release in maven central (along with
clojure-lang) would be
On Jun 17, 2:05 am, Parth parth.malwan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 10:24 am, Wrexsoul d2387...@bsnow.net wrote:
On Jun 17, 12:44 am, Daniel Lyons fus...@storytotell.org wrote:
(use 'clojure.contrib.seq-utils)
Don't have that library. Still hasn't been released yet, last I
checked.
On Jun 17, 3:20 am, kkw kevin.k@gmail.com wrote:
I only knew about map, apply, and reduce from studying haskell in uni.
I've not heard of 'reduce' referred to as 'accum', but then again when
I wanted to determine the number of elements in a seq, I kept
searching for 'length' and 'size
On Jun 17, 10:51 am, Mark Volkmann r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:41 AM, CuppoJava patrickli_2...@hotmail.comwrote:
Finding the right function in the doc admittedly takes a little
practice. I've learned gradually, that Clojure pretty much has all its
bases
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Wrexsoul d2387...@bsnow.net wrote:
Even though clojure.contrib hasn't been released as 1.0 or anything
official-sounding, I reckon it still beats the heck out of me
reinventing the wheel, especially with the calibre of folks who've
contributed to
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:51:48 -0700 (PDT),
Wrexsoul d2387...@bsnow.net wrote:
On Jun 17, 3:20 am, kkw kevin.k@gmail.com wrote:
I only knew about map, apply, and reduce from studying haskell in uni.
I've not heard of 'reduce' referred to as 'accum', but then again when
I wanted to determine
On Jun 17, 1:22 am, Wrexsoul d2387...@bsnow.net wrote:
On Jun 17, 12:44 am, Parth parth.malwan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 9:34 am, Wrexsoul d2387...@bsnow.net wrote:
I'm shocked that this is missing from clojure.core:
(defn accum [f init coll]
(loop [x init c coll
On Jun 17, 2:25 pm, Cosmin Stejerean cstejer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Wrexsoul d2387...@bsnow.net wrote:
Even though clojure.contrib hasn't been released as 1.0 or anything
official-sounding, I reckon it still beats the heck out of me
reinventing the wheel,
On Jun 17, 2:47 pm, Kyle Schaffrick k...@raidi.us wrote:
As a friendly suggestion, I'd like to offer that perhaps the derision is
caused not by the fact that you had the initiative to implement it
yourself, but rather by such phrasing as:
I'm shocked that [reduce/accum/foldr] is missing
On Jun 17, 3:52 pm, Daniel Lyons fus...@storytotell.org wrote:
On Jun 17, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Rich Hickey wrote:
Please refrain from communicating this way on this group. If a post
annoys you please ignore it. It is much more important that we
maintain civility and respectfulness here.
My
On Jun 17, 4:00 pm, Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 1:22 am, Wrexsoul d2387...@bsnow.net wrote:
The docs definitely have problems if this can be missed despite a very
thorough search. The only more-thorough search would have been to
actually read the docs in their
by such phrasing as:
I'm shocked that [reduce/accum/foldr] is missing from clojure.core.
[...] This is one of the most basic, useful functions in functional
programming.
This seems to assert *as fact* that it is missing
Well *something* was certainly missing, or I would have found it. You
can't
Wrexsoul, please mate, these are good guys. Remember the beauty and
tradition of the language you're learning. It's a lisp and gives you
the power to effortlessly create almost any abstraction you can
imagine. Not being convinced of the beauty of this, open you mind a
bit and humble yourself some
I'm shocked that this is missing from clojure.core:
(defn accum [f init coll]
(loop [x init c coll]
(if (empty? c)
x
(recur (f x (first c)) (rest c)
user= (accum + 0 [1 2 3])
6
user= (accum + 0 [1 2 3 4 5])
15
This is one of the most basic, useful functions in functional
of the entire api docs to see if there was
anything like accum already in there. I examined every occurrence of
seq and turned up a blank.
The docs definitely have problems if this can be missed despite a very
thorough search. The only more-thorough search would have been to
actually read the docs
22 matches
Mail list logo
