On Feb 2, 2010, at 8:40 PM, Stuart Halloway wrote:
In teaching people Clojure, non-intuitive behavior with use/require is the #1
problem for beginners, by a mile. I believe we need both ordinary function
and macro versions, and I am pretty sure that a well-considered patch
implementing
On Feb 2, 8:40 pm, Stuart Halloway stuart.hallo...@gmail.com wrote:
SS: is require* an acceptable name for the function version?
I don't care what it's called so long as there's a function there.
While we're at it, I want import* back as a function.
-SS
--
You received this message because
On Feb 3, 10:06 am, Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 2, 8:40 pm, Stuart Halloway stuart.hallo...@gmail.com wrote:
SS: is require* an acceptable name for the function version?
I don't care what it's called so long as there's a function there.
While we're at it, I
On 3 February 2010 17:14, Stephen C. Gilardi squee...@mac.com wrote:
I believe it's also possible to make the change backward compatible so
arguments to the new require macro would work quoted or not. (by detecting
and ignoring (quote ...) special forms in arguments).
That's a good idea! A
Thank you. I try to use use function and it works, too.
--
Name: OGINO Masanori (荻野 雅紀)
E-mail: masanori.og...@gmail.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts
On Feb 2, 2:46 am, ataggart alex.tagg...@gmail.com wrote:
On a related note, it is my sincere hope that we get a version of
require and use which no longer require (ha!) the use of quoted
parens.
Absolutely not! Having 'require' as an ordinary function (not a
macro) is important for
On Feb 1, 9:23 pm, OGINO Masanori masanori.og...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I write a code on both 1.1 and master using duck-streams/io?
For now, yes, as ataggart showed. But I expect names in contrib will
be in flux for the next few weeks, so you should probably pick a
release and stick with it.
On 2 February 2010 17:05, Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 2, 2:46 am, ataggart alex.tagg...@gmail.com wrote:
On a related note, it is my sincere hope that we get a version of
require and use which no longer require (ha!) the use of quoted
parens.
Absolutely not!
On 2 February 2010 17:36, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 February 2010 17:05, Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 2, 2:46 am, ataggart alex.tagg...@gmail.com wrote:
On a related note, it is my sincere hope that we get a version of
require and use which no
On Feb 2, 7:05 am, Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 2, 2:46 am, ataggart alex.tagg...@gmail.com wrote:
On a related note, it is my sincere hope that we get a version of
require and use which no longer require (ha!) the use of quoted
parens.
Absolutely not!
And of course that should be (require '[clojure.contrib string io]) or
(require ['clojure.contrib 'string 'io]) so the symbols don't try to
get resolved.
On Feb 2, 10:41 am, ataggart alex.tagg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 2, 7:05 am, Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 2,
And of course, that *does* work, thus my complaint was moot, and the
symbol non-resolution was probably what Stuart was so aghast about
(even though it wasn't my point).
As Michael said: I wish I'd realised that just before posting rather
than just after :)
On Feb 2, 10:50 am, ataggart
On 2 February 2010 16:05, Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 2, 2:46 am, ataggart alex.tagg...@gmail.com wrote:
On a related note, it is my sincere hope that we get a version of
require and use which no longer require (ha!) the use of quoted
parens.
Absolutely not!
In teaching people Clojure, non-intuitive behavior with use/require is
the #1 problem for beginners, by a mile. I believe we need both
ordinary function and macro versions, and I am pretty sure that a well-
considered patch implementing this would be accepted.
SS: is require* an acceptable
Hello.
I built master branch of clojure and clojure-contrib and then I found
that there is no duck-streams. io exists.
Can I write a code on both 1.1 and master using duck-streams/io?
FYI, I want something like this Python code in Clojure:
try:
from clojure.contrib.io import
On Feb 1, 6:23 pm, OGINO Masanori masanori.og...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
I built master branch of clojure and clojure-contrib and then I found
that there is no duck-streams. io exists.
Can I write a code on both 1.1 and master using duck-streams/io?
FYI, I want something like this
On a related note, it is my sincere hope that we get a version of
require and use which no longer require (ha!) the use of quoted
parens. Thankfully the ns macro will work with solely nested vectors.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To
17 matches
Mail list logo
