Re: generic functions update

2009-02-21 Thread mikel
On Feb 20, 9:39 pm, mikel mev...@mac.com wrote: Taking Chouser's suggestion of using a proxy that implements the IDeref interface, and overrides deref to provide access to a closed- over atom, I rewrote generic functions without resorting to gen-class or external Java files. That makes me

Re: generic functions update

2009-02-21 Thread Dan Larkin
On Feb 21, 2009, at 2:23 PM, mikel wrote: If there's interest in having models and generic functions in contrib, I'll get a contributor agreement to Rich. Aye there is, from me at least. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are

Re: generic functions update

2009-02-21 Thread David Nolen
I'm interested as well. On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Dan Larkin d...@danlarkin.org wrote: On Feb 21, 2009, at 2:23 PM, mikel wrote: If there's interest in having models and generic functions in contrib, I'll get a contributor agreement to Rich. Aye there is, from me at least.

Re: generic functions update

2009-02-21 Thread mikel
On Feb 21, 2:03 pm, Dan Larkin d...@danlarkin.org wrote: On Feb 21, 2009, at 2:23 PM, mikel wrote: If there's interest in having models and generic functions in contrib, I'll get a contributor agreement to Rich. Aye there is, from me at least. I think about three people have

generic functions update

2009-02-20 Thread mikel
Taking Chouser's suggestion of using a proxy that implements the IDeref interface, and overrides deref to provide access to a closed- over atom, I rewrote generic functions without resorting to gen-class or external Java files. That makes me happy; good suggestion, Chouser. I made a couple of