What about using a function that throws an exception to quit?
The nice thing about using a function to quit is that then you can
return
values.
I've done so here:
http://gist.github.com/255883
In addition I've made it so the debug-repl call can wrap a form. If
you call quit-dr with no
On 11 Dec 2009, at 23:26, Dan Larkin wrote:
On Dec 11, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Sean Devlin wrote:
Wouldn't ::quit do the same thing?
It wouldn't, because the repl is evaluating in the context of
wherever you put the (debug-repl) call, so its namespace won't be
dr.
What about instead of
On 10 Dec 2009, at 21:34, George Jahad wrote:
are you using slime? Currently, you need to use a non-slime repl, (I
think because of how slime handles io redirection)
I don't use slime, but I had a similar issue with Counterclockwise/
Eclipse, which doesn't quite understand that
Great ! thanks Konrad !
Another, presumably more general solution, but implying modifications (by
adding another optional attribute) to clojure.main/repl, would be to give to
the REPL a particular instance whose meaning could be interpreted by the
reader as end the current reader.
This instance
On Dec 11, 2009, at 5:08 AM, Laurent PETIT wrote:
But then, we could even go one level deeper: not only provide a particular
instance that would allow to quit the REPL, but a set of instances. And if
the returned value of the call to the REPL returns one of the instances in
the set, then
Wouldn't ::quit do the same thing?
On Dec 11, 11:57 am, Stephen C. Gilardi squee...@mac.com wrote:
On Dec 11, 2009, at 5:08 AM, Laurent PETIT wrote:
But then, we could even go one level deeper: not only provide a particular
instance that would allow to quit the REPL, but a set of
namespacing symbols seems sufficient, indeed.
2009/12/11 Stephen C. Gilardi squee...@mac.com
On Dec 11, 2009, at 5:08 AM, Laurent PETIT wrote:
But then, we could even go one level deeper: not only provide a particular
instance that would allow to quit the REPL, but a set of instances. And
s/symbols/keywords/
2009/12/11 Laurent PETIT laurent.pe...@gmail.com
namespacing symbols seems sufficient, indeed.
2009/12/11 Stephen C. Gilardi squee...@mac.com
On Dec 11, 2009, at 5:08 AM, Laurent PETIT wrote:
But then, we could even go one level deeper: not only provide a particular
On Dec 11, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Sean Devlin wrote:
Wouldn't ::quit do the same thing?
It wouldn't, because the repl is evaluating in the context of wherever you put
the (debug-repl) call, so its namespace won't be dr.
What about instead of using keywords for commands, we use functions for
Hmmm... functions as commands at a REPL. Now I feel silly for
considering the keyword approach :)
On Dec 11, 5:26 pm, Dan Larkin d...@danlarkin.org wrote:
On Dec 11, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Sean Devlin wrote:
Wouldn't ::quit do the same thing?
It wouldn't, because the repl is evaluating in the
I'm having some trouble with Alex's macro. I can type in the debug-
repl, but when I hit enter, it just hangs and nothing happens.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that
are you using slime? Currently, you need to use a non-slime repl, (I
think because of how slime handles io redirection)
On Dec 10, 12:14 pm, kyle smith the1physic...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having some trouble with Alex's macro. I can type in the debug-
repl, but when I hit enter, it just hangs
Yes, I just figured that out. Is there a way to use this with slime?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
It's definitely on my todo list. But probably like yours, that list
ain't short.
On Dec 10, 12:56 pm, kyle smith the1physic...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I just figured that out. Is there a way to use this with slime?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Awesome! I've googled high and low for exactly this functionality in
the past. +1 for getting this into core or contrib if it could work
there. Can you wrap a require to make a whole library debuggable?
(with-lexical-frames (require 'foo.bar))
It would be very handy to have a debug mode
George Jahad cloj...@blackbirdsystems.net writes:
Every time I stick a println into some Clojure code to debug it, I
think to myself, This is Lisp! I should be able to insert a repl
here!
The problem is of course that Clojure's eval function doesn't know
about the surrounding lexical scope.
Brilliant. With such a simple change, I think we just revolutionized
the way
people debug Clojure. (They just don't realize it yet.)
On Dec 9, 3:46 am, Alex Osborne a...@meshy.org wrote:
Neat idea.
Unless I'm misunderstanding what your modifications do, I've come up
with a simple pure
On 9 Dec 2009, at 18:59, George Jahad wrote:
Brilliant. With such a simple change, I think we just revolutionized
the way people debug Clojure. (They just don't realize it yet.)
I for one do - this is an excellent improvement, and I hope that
Clojure IDEs will integrate similar tools into
Clojure IDEs will integrate similar tools into their debuggers. I'd
love to be able to single-step through my code and have a REPL in the
current environment at any time!
yes, catching up with what i assume CL can do would rock :-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Very cool. Any chance we'd see this get merged into 'new'?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first
Every time I stick a println into some Clojure code to debug it, I
think to myself, This is Lisp! I should be able to insert a repl
here!
The problem is of course that Clojure's eval function doesn't know
about the surrounding lexical scope. So I started asking myself, what
is the simplest change
I'm pretty pleased with the results and wanted to show them off. More
details here:
http://georgejahad.com/clojure/debug-repl.html
Pretty slick work, George! Thanks for sharing!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this
22 matches
Mail list logo
