http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Libraries is unorganized and out
of date - volunteers welcome.
James Reeves created http://www.clojure-toolbox.com/
-S
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Libraries is unorganized and out
of date - volunteers welcome.
I am interested in keeping the clojure libraries up to date. Can you give
me some ideas what are the
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:05:08 PM UTC-4, Mayank Jain wrote:
I am interested in keeping the clojure libraries up to date. Can you give
me some ideas what are the tasks that needs to be done? So that I have some
idea about it.
1. Send in a signed Clojure Contributor Agreement:
@Stuart
Thanks. But it says Send your signed agreement via postal mail to:
Do I need to send it via postal mail? (I stay in India)
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:05:08 PM UTC-4, Mayank Jain wrote:
I am
2012/9/26 Mayank Jain firesof...@gmail.com
Thanks. But it says Send your signed agreement via postal mail to:
Do I need to send it via postal mail? (I stay in India)
Unfortunately, yes. Clojure uses a fine crafted 16th century contributor
agreement process that does not
take into account that
2012/9/26 Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com
http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Libraries is unorganized and out
of date - volunteers welcome.
Stuart,
No, that's not how it works. You *first* make contribution process easy,
*then* ask people to volunteer.
Not the other way
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Michael Klishin
michael.s.klis...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, yes. Clojure uses a fine crafted 16th century contributor
agreement process that does not
take into account that there may be potential contributors outside of North
America and western Europe.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Michael Klishin
michael.s.klis...@gmail.com wrote:
No, that's not how it works. You *first* make contribution process easy,
*then* ask people to volunteer.
Michael,
Don't want to sound snarky here, but as we all know, easy != simple :)
Regards,
BG
--
2012/9/26 Baishampayan Ghose b.gh...@gmail.com
IMHO it's not that archaic. There are _many_ FOSS projects which
mandate a CLA of some sort (even the hippest projects like Node.js
have this http://nodejs.org/cla.html). The only contention is the
snail-mailing part, which I understand is
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Michael Klishin
michael.s.klis...@gmail.com wrote:
I am only talking about the snail mail part. I have no problem with CAs,
legal aspects of
OSS project governance or anything like that.
It took me a few hours to pass through the Neo4J contributor agreement
On Sunday, September 23, 2012 4:00:28 PM UTC-4, zcaudate wrote:
is there some sort of categorised list/wiki that we can add to for new
libraries?
I've started the [Clojure Dining
Car](http://www.unexpected-vortices.com/clojure/dining-car.html), but
haven't announced it yet because I still
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Michael Klishin
michael.s.klis...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/9/26 Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com
http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Libraries is unorganized and out
of date - volunteers welcome.
Stuart,
No, that's not how it works. You *first*
zcaudate:
is there some sort of categorised list/wiki that we can add to for new
libraries?
There are clojuresphere.com, clojure-toolbox.com and some groups of people
have their
own sites for their stuff: clojurewerkz.org, http://flatland.org.
If you want to make your library more visible,
I think the consensus is that an electronic way to send the CA is just
the right amount of effort required. You stil have to take the time to
fill out a legally binding agreement but it also doesn't rule out
those for whom snail mail is just too unpractical because they live
outside the US or
2012/9/26 Aaron Cohen aa...@assonance.org
No, only if you want an unfiltered stream of absolutely anyone to
contribute is that true. If you're ok with restricting volunteers to
the subset who are actually willing show a little effort, making the
process slightly cumbersome might even be a net
For what it's worth, I've organically discovered several of Clojurewerkz's
projects just via google search, so I think Michael's methods work,
although there is indeed a fair amount of effort involved in maintaining
the promotion.
I like the https://twitter.com/nodenpm for node.js npm package
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:48:27 PM UTC-4, John Gabriele wrote:
On Sunday, September 23, 2012 4:00:28 PM UTC-4, zcaudate wrote:
is there some sort of categorised list/wiki that we can add to for new
libraries?
I've started the Clojure Dining Car ...
Oh, sorry. You were
While I don't mind sending a document via mail, but saying, Pay 50$ (Approx
2500 Indian Rupees) for Hi, I want to help organize the library
documentation for clojure sounds unreasonable to me.
This maybe valid for US citizens, But you can't ask people who don't stay
in US for such a procedure.
2012/9/27 Wes Freeman freeman@gmail.com
For what it's worth, I've organically discovered several of Clojurewerkz's
projects just via google search, so I think Michael's methods work,
although there is indeed a fair amount of effort involved in maintaining
the promotion.
It's not that
is there some sort of categorised list/wiki that we can add to for new
libraries?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be
20 matches
Mail list logo
