I see now that the simpler expression:
#'clojure.core/spread
equivalent to
(var clojure.core/spread)
also works:
user= (#'clojure.core/spread [:a [:b :c]])
(:a :b :c)
This works for refs but not for atoms. :-/
Stu
--
You received this message because you are
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Chouser chou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi squee...@mac.com wrote:
On Dec 13, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Stuart Halloway wrote:
That's great. I wouldn't have expected it to work. Do you think this is by
design or
Hi,
Am 14.12.2009 um 07:16 schrieb Chouser:
I'd like a ruling on this as well. It solves a real problem of
macros getting access to helper functions, so if we shouldn't be
relying on it, a reliable solution would be desirable.
This technique is actually used in the new branch in
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Stuart Halloway
stuart.hallo...@gmail.com wrote:
I see now that the simpler expression:
#'clojure.core/spread
equivalent to
(var clojure.core/spread)
also works:
user= (#'clojure.core/spread [:a [:b :c]])
(:a :b :c)
This works
(1) Is there already a form that does this?
or
(2) If not, how can the following be better/simpler:
(use 'clojure.contrib.with-ns)
(defmacro wall-hack-var
Return the value of a var in a namespace, even
if it is private. Intended for test automation.
[ns v]
`(with-ns '~ns
On Dec 13, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Stuart Halloway wrote:
(1) Is there already a form that does this?
Hi Stuart,
I think the trick is resolving manually:
user= @#'clojure.core/spread
#core$spread__4510 clojure.core$spread__4...@bb273cc
user= (@#'clojure.core/spread [:a :b
Steve,
That's great. I wouldn't have expected it to work. Do you think this
is by design or coincidental/subject to change?
Stu
On Dec 13, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Stuart Halloway wrote:
(1) Is there already a form that does this?
Hi Stuart,
I think the trick is resolving manually:
On Dec 13, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Stuart Halloway wrote:
That's great. I wouldn't have expected it to work. Do you think this is by
design or coincidental/subject to change?
The expression I gave was:
@#'clojure.core/spread
equivalent to:
(deref (var clojure.core/spread))
I
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi squee...@mac.com wrote:
On Dec 13, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Stuart Halloway wrote:
That's great. I wouldn't have expected it to work. Do you think this is by
design or coincidental/subject to change?
The expression I gave was:
