Re: send versus send-off

2009-07-01 Thread Kai
Thanks Meikel and Steve it is quite clear now! I will redirect questions here should anybody ask. ~ Kai --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to

send versus send-off

2009-06-30 Thread Kai
I can't imagine that this hasn't been asked before, so please direct this post to an appropriate link if you know of it. (send a f args) Dispatch an action to an agent. Returns the agent immediately. Subsequently, in a thread from a thread pool, the state of the agent will be set to the value

Re: send versus send-off

2009-06-30 Thread Meikel Brandmeyer
Hi, Am 30.06.2009 um 23:30 schrieb Kai: Why is there a distinction between an action and a blocking action? What kind of concerns arise when you send a potentially blocking action to an agent and why is send-off better accommodated to deal with it? send serves the agent from a fixed

Re: send versus send-off

2009-06-30 Thread Stephen C. Gilardi
On Jun 30, 2009, at 5:30 PM, Kai wrote: From scheduling I know that there are CPU-bound and IO-bound processes. Perhaps send-off tends to hold off on yielding for longer durations since it expects frequent interrupts. If this is the case, I think it would be useful to elaborate on that in the