Excellent write up, thanks for doing that.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To
Jacob Goodson wrote:
I was wondering, would a GC like this one(or Azul's) make a
significant impact so that I, or others, could make games in a more
pure fashion? I WANT MY EFFIN PURITY!
I'm not particularly knowledgeable about either game development or
advanced garbage collection
unreachable. The normal GC would then have a lot less to do, helping
achieve shorter pauses.
i have long wondered a similar wonder. :-) (i also naively day-dream
one could get the C# IDisposing style for free with something like
that.) the BitC folks have talked about all sorts of things along
. My question is: Will clojure(the immutable composable side)
benefit from shenandoah(blasted font) at all? Can someone who knows a
good bit about clojure tell me if a more powerful garbage collector would
allow us clojurians to be more pure or is it something else inherently in
immutable land
(related: asteroids in cal, by way of haskell.
http://s3.amazonaws.com/ns999/cal.html)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please
java. It is no problem if this is the case, my
question has jack crap to do about getting good performance writing
asteroids. My question is: Will clojure(the immutable composable side)
benefit from shenandoah(blasted font) at all? Can someone who knows a
good bit about clojure tell me
How many people have heard of this GC?
http://www.jclarity.com/2014/02/19/shenandoah-a-new-low-pause-garbage-collection-algorithm-for-the-java-hotspot-jvm/
I want to know if this would benefit clojure. I wrote a small asteroids
game in clojure and the performance was not good. I stuck
in
isolation to get an idea of how its running.
- James
On 12 March 2014 21:53, Jacob Goodson submissionfight...@gmx.com wrote:
How many people have heard of this GC?
http://www.jclarity.com/2014/02/19/shenandoah-a-new-low-pause-garbage-collection-algorithm-for-the-java-hotspot-jvm/
I want to know
bazillion pure functions. I was wondering, would a GC like this one(or
Azul's) make a significant impact so that I, or others, could make games in
a more pure fashion? I WANT MY EFFIN PURITY!
i'd rather have linear types or something like that, than some gc
solution. :-) i mean, if i'm
, clojure is just a scripting
language that wraps java. It is no problem if this is the case, my
question has jack crap to do about getting good performance writing
asteroids. My question is: Will clojure(the immutable composable side)
benefit from shenandoah(blasted font) at all? Can someone
pure way or the mutate objects in place way? I can get great performance
with clojure, no doubt about it, by violating the shat out of functional
programming. I can not get great performance with the beautiful, pure,
composable, clojure that I desire!
(personally i think this is a great
I use mutation generously inside of functions. I do not consider that
impure at all, pragmatic yes, impure no. Has anyone used Azul's jvm and
gotten a big bump in performance?
On Wednesday, March 12, 2014 7:28:44 PM UTC-4, raould wrote:
pure way or the mutate objects in place way? I can
12 matches
Mail list logo
