On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Larrytheliquid
larrytheliq...@gmail.com wrote:
This is what I'm thinking, let me explain: http://gist.github.com/41468
(If you are familiar with RSpec, here is the equivalent RSpec example
http://rspec.info/examples.html)
I really like the look of this so
If you guys can get these changes sorted out quickly (next few weeks)
I would love to cover them in the book. No pressure. :-)
Thanks,
Stuart
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Larrytheliquid
larrytheliq...@gmail.com wrote:
This is what I'm thinking, let me explain:
On Dec 29, 9:12 pm, Larrytheliquid larrytheliq...@gmail.com wrote:
As I get closer to something I like, it seems that what I will end up with
will end up with will look look like where test-is seems to be heading.
Hi Larry,
You have laid out pretty clearly where I would like test-is to go
Thanks for the reply Stuart, I thought about similar things. I'm still not
sure which approach is better myself, but let me clarify a few things.
In the current design of test-is, every test must be attached to
the :test metadata of a Var. That's why deftest currently requires
a symbol, even a
;; Note: originally I was just going to write Stuart, but I think input from
anybody on the list could be valuable, so I'm CC'ing Clojure
Hi Stuart,
I've been working on an RSpec-like library for Clojure called Specjure. It
has gone through many iterations and the one that is currently up on
