You night want to consider this:
user= (def m {:myself nil :yourself 'moo})
#'user/m
user= m
{:myself nil, :yourself moo}
user= (def m2 (assoc m :myself m))
#'user/m2
user= m
{:myself nil, :yourself moo}
user= m2
{:myself {:myself nil, :yourself moo}, :yourself moo}
Now, if :myself' value were
Whatever you chose, you probably ought to show its source with an IDE
(whichever you chose: NetBeans. Eclipse, IntelliJ) but should probably
forget about emacs: many (most?) Java developers won't even consider
anything that isn't at least partially integrated within some IDE.
Not sure how much
A bit facetious, I know, but a not too sarcastic pun on the
current economic climate ...
foreclojure
:-)
Has good Googleability too :-)
On Jun 23, 5:21 pm, Laurent PETIT laurent.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
What about eclipjure ?
2009/6/23 Christophe Grand christo...@cgrand.net
On Tue, Jun
OK. That one with trivial to add :-)
(defn exit
Returns to the OS by forcibly exiting the platform
([] (. System exit 0))
([n] (. System exit n)))
Added inside boot.clj, right before
(import '(java.io Writer))
(defn- print-sequential [#^String begin, print-one,
Returns to the OS by forcibly exiting the platform
([ code] (. System exit (or code 0
Still puzzled as to why boot.clj needs to be passed as argument from
the command line, since it seems loaded anyway, seemingly from
clojure.jar ...
--
JFB
On Oct 4, 10:02 pm, verec [EMAIL
French expat, London, UK
On Oct 17, 10:27 am, Rastislav Kassak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Clojurians,
I think after 1st year of Clojure life it's good to check how far has
Clojure spread all over the world.
So wherever are you come from, be proud and say it.
I'm from Slovakia. :)
Given the total lack of generics use in the code (did someone notice a
? that I missed :-) and the fact that java.util.concurrent.*
originated as a separate, non core java library, you might as well
want to specifiy 1.4 ...
Just kidding, of course ... What's wrong with 1.6? Even us in OS X
land
More of an inquiry into the fp mindset as opposed to the procedural
one than anything else ...
If I got this right, there are two forms of iterations: internal and
external.
`map' is an internal iterator, `doseq' is an external iterator.
An internal iterator does the iteration by itself and
Hmmm.
Thank you for the post.
Questions of laziness apart, I know that recursion has been proven to
be equivalent to iterations (expect to weed out interview candidates,
as per Steve Yege's remarks :-)
But then why would we want any of `doseq', `dotimes' or `doall', and
if we do, is that set
I'm still active on this, as I'm sure Casey is. Though the recent crop
of incompatible changes means some rework as the target is moving :)
--
JFB
On Nov 21, 1:03 pm, MikeM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This came up on the list not long ago, don't know what the status is:
Je ne peux que louer l'effort et surtout éviter de décourager les
bonnes volontés, mais le résultat est si verbeux et si proche de ce
qu'on peut lire en informatique en Français, que je ne peux que douter
très fort de l'impact d'une telle traduction.
Je n'ai jamais cru un seul instant qu'une
Cela dit, au cours des derniers mois je me suis tenu dans des groupes
de discussions de programmation francophones et j'ai découvert qu'un
nombre assez important de gens sont soit très mal à l'aise en anglais
ou y sont carrément hostiles.
Ne pas vouloir utiliser l'Anglais pour l'informatique
+1 (avoid Maven, drop pom)
I'm just out of a project that has used Maven for more than 18 month.
The pain and frustration caused by the slowness and compexity of
Maven's download the whole internet approach can be matched only
bu the willingness of team astronauts to introduce Maven plugins in
At about 72:54 of the clojure sequence talk, Rich explains that he
doesn't want to provide false guaranties to people used to true
tail calls even though he could detect such tail position calls and
basically transforms them into what recur currently does.
I'm just curious about examples where
On Dec 20, 2:46 pm, Randall R Schulz rsch...@sonic.net wrote:
On Saturday 20 December 2008 06:29, verec wrote:
I'm just curious about examples where such a magic transformation
would result in violated assumptions.
Write some Clojure code and use recur freely, without regard to whether
On Dec 20, 3:03 pm, Christian Vest Hansen karmazi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 3:29 PM, verec
When they don't apply. As I understand things, this magic
transformation would have you think that clojure has true TCO, when
the tail-call - recur transformation in reality only
On Dec 20, 3:20 pm, verec jeanfrancois.brouil...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Though I wonder how complicated it would be to coalesce any such
set of mutually recursive functions into a single JVM method where
such local gotos bytecodes exist and are documented -- that's what
the Java continue xyz
You propose a clever trick, but unfortunately it would require even
more cleverness. What if foo, bar, and baz live in different
libraries, and you reload one of the libraries as part of a dynamic
update at runtime? How would the inline copies know they needed to
update?
The design simplicity is certainly very appealing, though it appears
that you can only operate on a predetermined fixed set of
registers (ie: a and b in your example) and would need to define as
many add_, sub_, mul_ ... variants as there are 'registers' in your
model.
Also, simple arithmetic
I'm must be missing something obvious for the [s1 s2] case of union:
Is it only that you've measured (conj s1 s2) to be faster when s2 is
the smallest ?
(defn un
([s1 s2]
(reduce conj s1 s2))
... )
user= (def a #{1 2 3})
user= (def b #{4 5 6 7})
user=
Count me in :)
--
JFB
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
)))
(.close clip)
(.close stream)
(try
(.open clip stream)
(.start clip)
(catch Exception e nil
(simple-play (URL. file:///Users/verec/Tools/workspace/BetfairV6_new/
resources/com/mac/verec/betfair/sounds/tinkalink2.wav))
--
JFB
On Jul 28, 2:00 am
Got to admit that I had a bit of a fight with the imports and
the line that reads:
(. javax.sound.sampled.LineEvent$Type STOP)
Your solution/syntax with
(LineEvent$Type/STOP)
is a clear winner! :-)
Thanks.
On Jul 28, 9:23 am, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/28 verec
First paragraph, first TBD:
Hi. I'm here to talk about Clojure, which I've done several times,
and never ... oh, yeah, once, at the European (TBD something that
sounds like cover less) workshop, for an audience of Lispers, but
European Common Lisp Workshop
:-)
--
JFB
On Aug 13, 9:40 pm, Andy
The two issues are orthogonal.
Even if Clojure had been going for full copies to preserve
immutability, the reason why the old copy would leak is only because
your code would hold a reference to it.
With structural sharing, those bits of old that are still retained
in new are precisely those
You may also want to browse this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread/a80e0767566357e5/224909f792464f6d
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that
I have two problems with the following code.
First, I have this `tos' business (to-string) because:
user= (first abc)
\a
user= (rest abc)
(\b \c)
Since I wanted to get strings out of strings, a character or a
collection is no good.
Second, I ended-up having to use a mutable atom `res' because I
Posted too quickly ... replace ana3 with anagram. I cleaned-up the
code before posting, forgetting that the previous version ana3 was
still in the REPL ... Oh well ...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
28 matches
Mail list logo
