The discussion on the clojure-dev list is not about *if* CAs will be
accepted electronically, but *how*. Stuart Halloway requested help finding
examples of the processes that other organizations have developed for
receiving contributor agreements. In particular, he wanted to know if some
large
I think I understand what Michael mean by bias, am I the only one with a
CA to also understand it ? :-)
Let's try again: the root problem is not about having to send CAs via
paper, pidgeon or electronically. It is how to build a process so that it
does not get in the way of as many people willing
attention that there is a Clojure CA over email thread
going on clojure-dev:
https://groups.google.com/group/clojure-dev/browse_thread/thread/e81484f0eaa76277
Because folks who have a problem with the current paper CA process are least
likely to be on that list
(that requires you to mail
2012/10/31 Andy Fingerhut andy.finger...@gmail.com
I don't think the idea of the discussion is to go by majority vote
It's not about making decisions by majority vote, Andy. It is about
making sure many members of the community can *participate* or even
simple be aware of important
On Oct 30, 2012, at 3:58 PM, Michael Klishin wrote:
2012/10/31 Andy Fingerhut andy.finger...@gmail.com
I don't think the idea of the discussion is to go by majority vote
It's not about making decisions by majority vote, Andy. It is about
making sure many members of the community can
