He may have some interesting points but...
Anyone who makes grandiose claims and can't bother to give credit to
the people who have helped them along the way deserves to be ignored.
My feelings exactly. His perception of himself seems self-aggrandizing as well.
Why is John Carmack the only
On Dec 6, 9:16 pm, Phil Hagelberg p...@hagelb.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:00 PM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for asking here, but I think it's at least a little relevant to
Clojure since I for one wouldn't be installing emacs if it wasn't for
Clojure and Slime. Getting
I'm sure a few people have read this news already. It's been up for a
week, though strangely ZDnet -- which, on principle, I refuse to link
to -- is one of the only places to write it up.
http://pr-usa.net/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=560484Itemid=
Nice news to read before
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Alec Battles alec.batt...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure a few people have read this news already. It's been up for a
week, though strangely ZDnet -- which, on principle, I refuse to link
to
Why?
Because of the website's close ties to Washington.
This blog post
I don't use OS X so I can't comment on such a consensus, but while I
appreciate the sentiment, it's actually harmful to some degree to have
lots of blog posts scattered around everywhere that all have slightly
different advice, especially since that advice usually becomes
outdated within the
For those who were not around when the Common Lisp
standard was being debated you might find this interesting:
http://lisp.geek.nz/weekly-repl/
Common Lisp Standardization: The good, the bad, and the ugly
by Peter Seibel
Thanks for sharing this. Anyone whose name pulls up a profile page
Because posting the link would make some modicum of sense…
http://blog.twonegatives.com/post/2168030248/kata
^_^
Excellent blog post.
I have yet to read Dave Thomas's book, though it's very high on my list.
One note: As a fairly seasoned amateur of pretty much anything East
Asian I object
I use audio in much the same way. On the other hand, I hardly listen
to music. I have nothing to contribute, but would be interested in
seeing what people end up posting.
I suppose extracting the audio track from a video lecture is in most
cases a pretty good idea... (after all, if Feynman were
Andriod is not Clojure's joker card, Clojure is Andriod's joker card.
--DragonCat
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be
Thought some Clojure folk might enjoy this:
http://blog.stephenwolfram.com/2010/11/100-years-since-principia-mathematica/
Though I don't use Clojure (I follow this list out of curiosity), I
have a hard time imagining why anything Wolfram writes is interesting,
and furthermore why any a user of
I thought his blog had some interesting points. I enjoyed reading it. Do I
wish Mathematica was more affordable and/or open source? Yes. So what.
That doesn't make Wolfram a lunatic or a fraud.
Do you recall me saying that?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
11 matches
Mail list logo
