Hi guys,
we are moving forward pretty fast in the development of support for Hyper-V,
we'll be able to share the first bits hopefully very soon. :-)
In the meantime we have a small problem to solve with the secondary storage: in
our test environment, we created a dummy Hyper-V resource, but we
On 01/06/12 10:46 AM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
wrote:
A third way is to split the agent api into 2 commands: CreateVm and
StartVm.
CloudStack already has two separate agent api commands for
creating(CreateCommand) and starting (StartCommand) VM operations. Not
sure if any
Hi Rajesh,
here's the error. It happens when we try to add a template. We need to find a
way to replace this with a dummy implementation.
[java] WARN [storage.download.DownloadMonitorImpl] (http-8080-5:) There is no
secondary storage VM for secondary storage host
Hi Alessandro,
SSVM needs to have agent running which connects to MS on port 8250 (it is a
remote agent). The responsibility of this agent is to take commands from MS and
take some action.
One example of this is - MS instructing the SSVM to download a template on
secondary storage and the agent
Hi,
On 06/01/2012 04:37 PM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
On 05/31/2012 01:35 PM, David Nalley wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Robert Schweikertrjsch...@suse.com
wrote:
On 05/31/2012 12:35 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
The master branch hasn't diverged much from the 3.0.x branch at this
point.
Hi Adrian,
Please find below explanation of the vmtemplate status. It would be great if we
could add this explanation against the enums as comments as well.
UNKNOWN - status of download is not known. Example - When the job for
downloading doesn't exist during progress check.
ABANDONED - the
Thanks, Nitin. Really helps!
Most importantly, I need to know which of these are available states. I
believe the only available states are DOWNLOADED and UPLOADED?
Cheers!
-A
On Jun 1, 2012 8:21 AM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Please find below explanation of the
Specifically with the parameters startip and endip. I assume this is for
the DHCP range correct? If that's the case then I may have tripped onto a bug
because even though I set the start IP to .100 and end to .250 it's been
assigning addresses to instances outside of the range.
I am
Hi,
I have used git to get the cloudstack source from github to have a look at this
problem.
I could not find that part of code so I run a grep -R usageRecordGeneric ./*
in the source folder and got no results.
I can't find the code you've pasted earlier. Am I missing something?
Regards
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:14 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David...
Would you please elaborate on what kind of agreement CS has with
Transifex ? The loclaized content you get from their service
Well, that's kind off a Citrix question. Is Citrix interested in
having a public branch to work in? From a community perspective it
woudl appear that only the master branch is of interest plus any
feature branches that are public.
I don't get the Citrix question?
Cirtix has
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:51 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Hi folks,
$dayjob has reserved some space in San Diego immediately preceeding
LinuxConNA [1] (Aug 29-31) during which they plan to hold XenSummit
[2] (Aug 27-28) - and they have some excess room space they are not
going to
As a someone new to open source cloud platforms (Xen, KVM, etc) and new to
CloudStack I'd like to see the space used to host an introduction to CloudStack
with a hands-on lab (if I had three wishes to use).
Just my $0.02,
Eric P.
Truckee, CA
- Original Message -
From: David Nalley
Hi folks,
If you are looking to get started helping to move CloudStack along
towards our initial Apache release, but are still unfamiliar, I have a
great project you can help with. Part of the ASF's legal guidelines
[1] require that we have a very specific notice in the header of each
source
On 6/1/12 7:57 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
So it seems we have some consensus around trying this maintainer model
out - so now we need the existing committers to step up for some of
these 'modules'. I am happy to step up for packaging stuff (debs and
rpms) and some of the related things
15 matches
Mail list logo
